- Research into practice
- knowledge mobilization
Access to Document
- __c1staffhome1_STAFFHOME1_Caint_My Documents_Research_PostPrints_RPE 2016.docxAccepted author manuscript, 71.9 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'Denial, opposition, rejection or dissent: why do teachers contest research evidence?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Denial, opposition, rejection or dissent: why do teachers contest research evidence?
AU - Cain, Tim
N1 - Bartels, N. 2003. How teachers and researchers read academic articles. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(7), 737-753. Baudrillard, J. 1996. The system of objects. London: Verso. Belk, R. 1995. Studies in the New Consumer Behaviour, in: D. Miner (Ed.) Acknowledging Consumption (pp. 8-95). London: Routledge. Berlin, J. E. 2009. It's all a matter of perspective: Student perceptions on the impact of being labeled gifted and talented, Roeper Review, 31(4), 217-223. Biesta, G. J. 2010. Why ‘what works’ still won’t work: From evidence-based education to value-based education, Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(5), 491-503. Borg, S. 2009. English language teachers’ conceptions of research. Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 358-388. Brown, C. 2014. The policy agora: how power inequalities affect the interaction between researchers and policy makers. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 10(3), 421-438. Brown, C. 2015. Evidence-informed Policy and Practice in Education: A Sociological Grounding. London: Bloomsbury. Butera, F., Darnon, C., & Mugny, G. 2011. Learning from conflict. In: J. Jetten & M. J. Hornsey (Eds.), Rebels in groups: Dissent, deviance, difference, and defiance. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 36-53. Cabinet Office 2014. What works? Evidence for decision makers. Online: www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/378038/What_works_evidence_for_decision_makers.pdf Campbell-Lendrum, D., & Bertollini, R. 2010. Science, media and public perception: implications for climate and health policies, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88(4), 242-242A. Carter, A. 2015. Carter Review of Initial Teacher Training (ITT). Online: www.gov.uk/government/publications/carter-review-of-initial-teacher-training Case, P., Case, S., & Catling, S. 2000. Please show you're working: A critical assessment of the impact of OFSTED inspection on primary teachers, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(4), 605-621. Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage. Clifford, G. J. 1973. A history of the impact of research on teaching. In: R.M.W. Travers (Ed) Second handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally. 1-46. Cope, P. 2003. OFSTED, fun, and learning: a case study of a school music inspection, British Journal of Music Education, 20(03), 307-315. Dewey, J. 1929. The sources of a science of education. New York: Liveright. Diethelm, P., & McKee, M.(2009. Denialism: what is it and how should scientists respond?, The European Journal of Public Health, 19(1), 2-4. Earl, L. M., & Timperley, H. 2009. Using conversations to make sense of evidence: Possibilities and pitfalls, in: L.M. Earl & H. Timperley (Eds) Professional learning conversations: Challenges in using evidence for improvement (pp. 121-126). New York: Springer. Fleisch, B. 2009. Learning conversations stillborn: distrust and education policy dialogue in South Africa, in: L.M. Earl & H. Timperley (Eds) Professional Learning Conversations: Challenges in Using Evidence for Improvement (pp. 109-119) Amsterdam: Springer. Fleming, C. M. 1946. Research and the basic curriculum. London: University of London Press. Gore, J. M., & Gitlin, A. D. 2004. [RE] Visioning the academic–teacher divide: power and knowledge in the educational community. Teachers and teaching: theory and practice, 10(1), 35-58. Gov.uk. 2014. Newly qualified teachers: annual survey. Online: www.gov.uk/government/collections/newly-qualified-teachers-annual-survey Hall, S. 1993. Encoding, decoding. In: S. During (ed.) The cultural studies reader. London: Routledge 477-487. Hammersley, M. 1997. Educational research and teaching: a response to David Hargreaves’ TTA lecture, British Educational Research Journal, 23, 2, pp. 141–161. Hammersley, M. 2002. Educational research, policymaking and practice. London: Paul Chapman. Hammersley, M. 2005. The Myth of Research‐based Practice: The Critical Case of Educational Inquiry, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8:4, 317-330. Hargreaves, D. 1996. Teaching as a Research-Based Profession: possibilities and prospects. Teacher Training Agency Annual Lecture. London: Teacher Training Agency. Hoofnagle, M. 2007. Denialism Blog: About, Available online at http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/about [Accessed 17.07.2014]. Ion, G., & Iucu, R. 2014. Professionals' perceptions about the use of research in educational practice. European Journal of Higher Education, 4(4), 334-347. Jeffrey, B., & Woods, P. 1996. Feeling deprofessionalised: The social construction of emotions during an OFSTED inspection, Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(3), 325-343. Jones, M. L. 2009. A study of novice special educators' views of evidence-based practices. The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 32(2), 101-120. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. London: Penguin Books. Kalichman, S. C., Eaton, L., & Cherry, C. 2010. “There is no proof that HIV causes AIDS”: AIDS denialism beliefs among people living with HIV/AIDS, Journal of behavioral medicine, 33(6), 432-440. Kennedy, M. M. 1997. How teachers connect research and practice. Midwestern Educational Researcher, 10(1), 25-29. Kennedy, M. M. 1999. A test of some common contentions about educational research. American educational research journal, 36(3), 511-541. Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Gignac, G. E. 2013a. NASA faked the moon landing—therefore (climate) science is a hoax: an anatomy of the motivated rejection of science, Psychological science, 24(5), 622-633. Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Oberauer, K. 2013b. The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science, PloS one, 8(10), e75637. Little, J. W., & Curry, M. W. 2009. Structuring talk about teaching and learning: The use of evidence in protocol-based conversation, in: L.M. Earl & H. Timperley (Eds) Professional learning conversations: Challenges in using evidence for improvement (pp. 29-42). Amsterdam: Springer. Lysenko, L. V., Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Dagenais, C., & Janosz, M. 2014. Educational Research in Educational Practice: Predictors of Use. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l'éducation, 37(2), 1-26. McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. 2011. Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States, Global Environmental Change, 21(4), 1163-1172. McIntyre, D. 2005. Bridging the gap between research and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(3), 357-382. McKee, M., & Diethelm, P. 2010. How the growth of denialism undermines public health, The British Medical Journal doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c6950 McNiff, J. (2002) Action research for professional development: concise advice for new action researchers. Online: www.jeanmcniff.com/booklet1.html [Accessed 04.10.15] Nemeth, C. J., & Goncalo, J. A. 2011. Rogues and heroes: Finding value in dissent. In: J. Jetten & M. J. Hornsey (Eds.), Rebels in groups: Dissent, deviance, difference, and defiance. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 17-35. Nicholson–Goodman, J., & Garman, N. B. 2007. Mapping practitioner perceptions of ‘It’s research based’: scientific discourse, speech acts and the use and abuse of research. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 10(3), 283-299. Nisbet, J. D., & Broadfoot, P. 1980. The impact of research on policy and practice in education. Aberdeen University Press. Oancea, A. 2014. Teachers’ professional knowledge and state-funded teacher education: a (hi)story of critiques and silences. Oxford Review of Education, 40(4), 497-519. Office for Standards in Education 2009. Gifted and talented pupils in schools. London: Ofsted. Qvortrup, L. 2004. The mystery of knowledge. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 11(3), 9-29. Ratcliffe, M., Bartholomew, H., Hames, V., Hind, A., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Osborne, J. 2005. Evidence‐based practice in science education: the researcher–user interface. Research papers in Education, 20(2), 169-186. Rogers, K. B. 2007. Lessons Learned About Educating the Gifted and Talented A Synthesis of the Research on Educational Practice, Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(4), 382-396. Rowe, M. B. (1986). Wait time: slowing down may be a way of speeding up!.Journal of teacher education, 37(1), 43-50. Shkedi, A. 1998. Teachers' attitudes towards research: A challenge for qualitative researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(4), 559-577. Thomas, G. & Pring, R. 2004. Evidence-based practice in education. Buckingham: Open University Press. Tomlinson, C. A. 2005. Quality curriculum and instruction for highly able students, Theory into practice, 44(2), 160-166. Tripney, J., Kenny, C., & Gough, D. 2014. Enabling the Use of Research Evidence Within Educational Policymaking in Europe: Lessons from the EIPEE Project. European Education, 46(1), 55-74 Vanderlinde, R., & van Braak, J. 2010. The gap between educational research and practice: views of teachers, school leaders, intermediaries and researchers. British Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 299-316. Whitehead, J., & McNiff, J. (2006). Action research: Living theory. London: Sage. Wikeley, F. 1998. Dissemination of research as a tool for school improvement?. School Leadership & Management, 18(1), 59-73. Winch, C., Oancea, A. & Orchard, J. 2015. The contribution of educational research to teachers’ professional learning: philosophical understandings, Oxford Review of Education, 41(2), 202-216. Zellermayer, M. 2001. Resistance as catalyst in teachers' professional development, in: C. M. Clark (Ed.). Talking shop: Authentic conversation and teacher learning (pp.40-63). (New York, Teachers College Press). Zeuli, J. S. 1994. How do teachers understand research when they read it? Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(1), 39-55.
PY - 2016/8/31
Y1 - 2016/8/31
N2 - Internationally, efforts are being made for educational practice to be research-informed on the grounds that schoolteachers will implement what research shows will ‘work’. However, teachers do not necessarily accept research findings; sometimes they contest them. This article considers teachers’ contestation in two empirical studies, using the concepts of denial, opposition, rejection and dissent as a framework for understanding such contestation. It finds three reasons why teachers contest research evidence: within-research issues, issues around generalizing from research to practice, and non-congruence with personal values. These are explored with reference to the power differentials that are said to exist between research and practice.
AB - Internationally, efforts are being made for educational practice to be research-informed on the grounds that schoolteachers will implement what research shows will ‘work’. However, teachers do not necessarily accept research findings; sometimes they contest them. This article considers teachers’ contestation in two empirical studies, using the concepts of denial, opposition, rejection and dissent as a framework for understanding such contestation. It finds three reasons why teachers contest research evidence: within-research issues, issues around generalizing from research to practice, and non-congruence with personal values. These are explored with reference to the power differentials that are said to exist between research and practice.
KW - Research into practice
KW - knowledge mobilization
KW - teachers
KW - schools
U2 - 10.1080/02671522.2016.1225807
DO - 10.1080/02671522.2016.1225807
M3 - Article
VL - 32
SP - 611
EP - 625
JO - Research Papers in Education
JF - Research Papers in Education
SN - 0267-1522
IS - 5