Delusional discourse: an investigation comparing the spontaneous causal attributions of paranoid and non-paranoid individuals

David A Lee, Fiona Randall, Geoffrey Beattie, Richard P Bentall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research into the nature of attributional reasoning in paranoia has for the most part been restricted to questionnaire-based approaches. This fails to address the issue of whether a distinctive attributional style underpins the everyday talk of paranoid individuals. This study aimed to investigate whether attributional models of paranoid delusions applied to spontaneous attributions generated in the discourse of 12 paranoid and 12 non-paranoid speakers. Causal attributions for negative and positive life experiences were extracted from interview transcripts and rated using the Content Analysis of Verbatim Explanations (CAVE) technique. It was found that, as a proportion, paranoids made more attributions for negative events that were of an external-personal, stable and global nature (as attributional models would predict). They also made significantly more external-personal attributions for negative events and, in one of two datasets, showed a more external mean CAVE rating for negative events than the non-paranoid controls. This paper highlights important issues underlying the extraction of attributions from paranoid talk, and discusses the implications for attributional models of paranoia and future discourse-based research in this area.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)525-40
Number of pages16
JournalPsychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice
Volume77
Issue numberPt 4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2004

Fingerprint

Paranoid Disorders
Delusions
Life Change Events
Research
Interviews
Attribution
Causal
Discourse
Datasets
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Attitude
  • Culture
  • Delusions/diagnosis
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Life Change Events
  • Male
  • Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis
  • Schizophrenia, Paranoid/diagnosis
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Verbal Behavior

Cite this

@article{7e27fb569f5d46c982b4f8567d23a459,
title = "Delusional discourse: an investigation comparing the spontaneous causal attributions of paranoid and non-paranoid individuals",
abstract = "Research into the nature of attributional reasoning in paranoia has for the most part been restricted to questionnaire-based approaches. This fails to address the issue of whether a distinctive attributional style underpins the everyday talk of paranoid individuals. This study aimed to investigate whether attributional models of paranoid delusions applied to spontaneous attributions generated in the discourse of 12 paranoid and 12 non-paranoid speakers. Causal attributions for negative and positive life experiences were extracted from interview transcripts and rated using the Content Analysis of Verbatim Explanations (CAVE) technique. It was found that, as a proportion, paranoids made more attributions for negative events that were of an external-personal, stable and global nature (as attributional models would predict). They also made significantly more external-personal attributions for negative events and, in one of two datasets, showed a more external mean CAVE rating for negative events than the non-paranoid controls. This paper highlights important issues underlying the extraction of attributions from paranoid talk, and discusses the implications for attributional models of paranoia and future discourse-based research in this area.",
keywords = "Adult, Attitude, Culture, Delusions/diagnosis, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis, Schizophrenia, Paranoid/diagnosis, Surveys and Questionnaires, Verbal Behavior",
author = "Lee, {David A} and Fiona Randall and Geoffrey Beattie and Bentall, {Richard P}",
year = "2004",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1348/1476083042555361",
language = "English",
volume = "77",
pages = "525--40",
journal = "Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice",
issn = "1476-0835",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "Pt 4",

}

Delusional discourse : an investigation comparing the spontaneous causal attributions of paranoid and non-paranoid individuals. / Lee, David A; Randall, Fiona; Beattie, Geoffrey; Bentall, Richard P.

In: Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, Vol. 77, No. Pt 4, 12.2004, p. 525-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Delusional discourse

T2 - an investigation comparing the spontaneous causal attributions of paranoid and non-paranoid individuals

AU - Lee, David A

AU - Randall, Fiona

AU - Beattie, Geoffrey

AU - Bentall, Richard P

PY - 2004/12

Y1 - 2004/12

N2 - Research into the nature of attributional reasoning in paranoia has for the most part been restricted to questionnaire-based approaches. This fails to address the issue of whether a distinctive attributional style underpins the everyday talk of paranoid individuals. This study aimed to investigate whether attributional models of paranoid delusions applied to spontaneous attributions generated in the discourse of 12 paranoid and 12 non-paranoid speakers. Causal attributions for negative and positive life experiences were extracted from interview transcripts and rated using the Content Analysis of Verbatim Explanations (CAVE) technique. It was found that, as a proportion, paranoids made more attributions for negative events that were of an external-personal, stable and global nature (as attributional models would predict). They also made significantly more external-personal attributions for negative events and, in one of two datasets, showed a more external mean CAVE rating for negative events than the non-paranoid controls. This paper highlights important issues underlying the extraction of attributions from paranoid talk, and discusses the implications for attributional models of paranoia and future discourse-based research in this area.

AB - Research into the nature of attributional reasoning in paranoia has for the most part been restricted to questionnaire-based approaches. This fails to address the issue of whether a distinctive attributional style underpins the everyday talk of paranoid individuals. This study aimed to investigate whether attributional models of paranoid delusions applied to spontaneous attributions generated in the discourse of 12 paranoid and 12 non-paranoid speakers. Causal attributions for negative and positive life experiences were extracted from interview transcripts and rated using the Content Analysis of Verbatim Explanations (CAVE) technique. It was found that, as a proportion, paranoids made more attributions for negative events that were of an external-personal, stable and global nature (as attributional models would predict). They also made significantly more external-personal attributions for negative events and, in one of two datasets, showed a more external mean CAVE rating for negative events than the non-paranoid controls. This paper highlights important issues underlying the extraction of attributions from paranoid talk, and discusses the implications for attributional models of paranoia and future discourse-based research in this area.

KW - Adult

KW - Attitude

KW - Culture

KW - Delusions/diagnosis

KW - Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Life Change Events

KW - Male

KW - Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis

KW - Schizophrenia, Paranoid/diagnosis

KW - Surveys and Questionnaires

KW - Verbal Behavior

U2 - 10.1348/1476083042555361

DO - 10.1348/1476083042555361

M3 - Article

C2 - 15588459

VL - 77

SP - 525

EP - 540

JO - Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice

JF - Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice

SN - 1476-0835

IS - Pt 4

ER -