'Dangerous Minds?' Deconstructing Counter-Terrorism Discourse, Radicalisation and the ‘Psychological Vulnerability’ of Muslim Children and Young People in Britain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)
219 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Current British Government strategies to counter terrorism (exemplified in the Prevent policy and Channel programme) are based upon a problematic fusion of certain dominant explanatory models of the ‘causes of terrorism’ (specifically, ‘psychological vulnerability’ to ‘radicalisation’) with discourses of ‘child protection/safeguarding’. Derived from particular mainstream traditions of social scientific epistemology and inquiry, these knowledge paradigms ‘legitimise’ a pre-emptive, interventionist and securitising approach that affects the lives of young British Muslims. The aim of this article is to challenge some of the assumptions that underpin the understanding of ‘radicalisation’, ‘psychological vulnerability’ and ‘child protection’ evidenced in these state practices and policies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)242-256
Number of pages15
JournalChildren and Society
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Apr 2014

Fingerprint

Terrorism
Islam
radicalization
child protection
terrorism
Muslim
vulnerability
Psychology
discourse
epistemology
paradigm
cause

Keywords

  • Child protection
  • Childhood
  • Mental health
  • Rights
  • Youth

Cite this

@article{6b6122f6818e4187823ffb439d4e8d15,
title = "'Dangerous Minds?' Deconstructing Counter-Terrorism Discourse, Radicalisation and the ‘Psychological Vulnerability’ of Muslim Children and Young People in Britain",
abstract = "Current British Government strategies to counter terrorism (exemplified in the Prevent policy and Channel programme) are based upon a problematic fusion of certain dominant explanatory models of the ‘causes of terrorism’ (specifically, ‘psychological vulnerability’ to ‘radicalisation’) with discourses of ‘child protection/safeguarding’. Derived from particular mainstream traditions of social scientific epistemology and inquiry, these knowledge paradigms ‘legitimise’ a pre-emptive, interventionist and securitising approach that affects the lives of young British Muslims. The aim of this article is to challenge some of the assumptions that underpin the understanding of ‘radicalisation’, ‘psychological vulnerability’ and ‘child protection’ evidenced in these state practices and policies.",
keywords = "Child protection, Childhood, Mental health, Rights, Youth",
author = "Vicki Coppock and Mark McGovern",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1111/chso.12060",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "242--256",
journal = "Children and Society",
issn = "0951-0605",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'Dangerous Minds?' Deconstructing Counter-Terrorism Discourse, Radicalisation and the ‘Psychological Vulnerability’ of Muslim Children and Young People in Britain

AU - Coppock, Vicki

AU - McGovern, Mark

PY - 2014/4/17

Y1 - 2014/4/17

N2 - Current British Government strategies to counter terrorism (exemplified in the Prevent policy and Channel programme) are based upon a problematic fusion of certain dominant explanatory models of the ‘causes of terrorism’ (specifically, ‘psychological vulnerability’ to ‘radicalisation’) with discourses of ‘child protection/safeguarding’. Derived from particular mainstream traditions of social scientific epistemology and inquiry, these knowledge paradigms ‘legitimise’ a pre-emptive, interventionist and securitising approach that affects the lives of young British Muslims. The aim of this article is to challenge some of the assumptions that underpin the understanding of ‘radicalisation’, ‘psychological vulnerability’ and ‘child protection’ evidenced in these state practices and policies.

AB - Current British Government strategies to counter terrorism (exemplified in the Prevent policy and Channel programme) are based upon a problematic fusion of certain dominant explanatory models of the ‘causes of terrorism’ (specifically, ‘psychological vulnerability’ to ‘radicalisation’) with discourses of ‘child protection/safeguarding’. Derived from particular mainstream traditions of social scientific epistemology and inquiry, these knowledge paradigms ‘legitimise’ a pre-emptive, interventionist and securitising approach that affects the lives of young British Muslims. The aim of this article is to challenge some of the assumptions that underpin the understanding of ‘radicalisation’, ‘psychological vulnerability’ and ‘child protection’ evidenced in these state practices and policies.

KW - Child protection

KW - Childhood

KW - Mental health

KW - Rights

KW - Youth

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/dangerous-minds-deconstructing-counterterrorism-discourse-radicalisation-psychological-vulnerability

U2 - 10.1111/chso.12060

DO - 10.1111/chso.12060

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 242

EP - 256

JO - Children and Society

JF - Children and Society

SN - 0951-0605

IS - 3

ER -