Constructing Women who Experience Male Violence: Criminal Legal Discourse and Individual Experiences

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between how women who experience violence from a male partner construct themselves, and how criminal legal discourse constructs female victims of violence. It is argued that in both arenas, women are constructed according to norms which emanate from a discourse of conventional femininity which operates together with a practice of shame. Utilising empirical data gained from qualitative interviews with women who experienced male violence, the article contends that the construction of the female victim of violence in criminal legal discourses as imbued with stereotypical ‘feminine’ characteristics such as passivity and weakness, may influence these women’s own construction and understanding of themselves. The existence of a practice of shame further consolidates the self-regulation of the women themselves to these norms of femininity. This construction is posited to be problematic as the experiences of women of male violence rarely ‘fit’ within these explanations. The article contends that in order to better understand women’s experiences of male violence; both criminal legal and individual women’s discourses need to be read in terms of the power, knowledge and effects which they exert upon individual women. It is argued that this alternative reading of these discourses has the potential for transformation as they are invested in the subject.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)123-142
JournalLiverpool Law Review
Volume29
Issue number2
Early online date10 Sep 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

violence
discourse
experience
shame
femininity
self-regulation
qualitative interview

Keywords

  • Conventional femininity
  • Criminal law
  • Discourse
  • Knowledge
  • Normalisation
  • Power
  • Practice of shame
  • Strength
  • Methodology
  • Weakness
  • Violence

Cite this

@article{4005bcdccfec4e87bffa5823d89078f1,
title = "Constructing Women who Experience Male Violence: Criminal Legal Discourse and Individual Experiences",
abstract = "This article examines the relationship between how women who experience violence from a male partner construct themselves, and how criminal legal discourse constructs female victims of violence. It is argued that in both arenas, women are constructed according to norms which emanate from a discourse of conventional femininity which operates together with a practice of shame. Utilising empirical data gained from qualitative interviews with women who experienced male violence, the article contends that the construction of the female victim of violence in criminal legal discourses as imbued with stereotypical ‘feminine’ characteristics such as passivity and weakness, may influence these women’s own construction and understanding of themselves. The existence of a practice of shame further consolidates the self-regulation of the women themselves to these norms of femininity. This construction is posited to be problematic as the experiences of women of male violence rarely ‘fit’ within these explanations. The article contends that in order to better understand women’s experiences of male violence; both criminal legal and individual women’s discourses need to be read in terms of the power, knowledge and effects which they exert upon individual women. It is argued that this alternative reading of these discourses has the potential for transformation as they are invested in the subject.",
keywords = "Conventional femininity, Criminal law, Discourse, Knowledge, Normalisation, Power, Practice of shame, Strength, Methodology, Weakness, Violence",
author = "Helen Baker",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1007/s10991-008-9037-6",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "123--142",
journal = "Liverpool Law Review",
issn = "0144-932X",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

Constructing Women who Experience Male Violence: Criminal Legal Discourse and Individual Experiences. / Baker, Helen.

In: Liverpool Law Review, Vol. 29, No. 2, 2009, p. 123-142.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constructing Women who Experience Male Violence: Criminal Legal Discourse and Individual Experiences

AU - Baker, Helen

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - This article examines the relationship between how women who experience violence from a male partner construct themselves, and how criminal legal discourse constructs female victims of violence. It is argued that in both arenas, women are constructed according to norms which emanate from a discourse of conventional femininity which operates together with a practice of shame. Utilising empirical data gained from qualitative interviews with women who experienced male violence, the article contends that the construction of the female victim of violence in criminal legal discourses as imbued with stereotypical ‘feminine’ characteristics such as passivity and weakness, may influence these women’s own construction and understanding of themselves. The existence of a practice of shame further consolidates the self-regulation of the women themselves to these norms of femininity. This construction is posited to be problematic as the experiences of women of male violence rarely ‘fit’ within these explanations. The article contends that in order to better understand women’s experiences of male violence; both criminal legal and individual women’s discourses need to be read in terms of the power, knowledge and effects which they exert upon individual women. It is argued that this alternative reading of these discourses has the potential for transformation as they are invested in the subject.

AB - This article examines the relationship between how women who experience violence from a male partner construct themselves, and how criminal legal discourse constructs female victims of violence. It is argued that in both arenas, women are constructed according to norms which emanate from a discourse of conventional femininity which operates together with a practice of shame. Utilising empirical data gained from qualitative interviews with women who experienced male violence, the article contends that the construction of the female victim of violence in criminal legal discourses as imbued with stereotypical ‘feminine’ characteristics such as passivity and weakness, may influence these women’s own construction and understanding of themselves. The existence of a practice of shame further consolidates the self-regulation of the women themselves to these norms of femininity. This construction is posited to be problematic as the experiences of women of male violence rarely ‘fit’ within these explanations. The article contends that in order to better understand women’s experiences of male violence; both criminal legal and individual women’s discourses need to be read in terms of the power, knowledge and effects which they exert upon individual women. It is argued that this alternative reading of these discourses has the potential for transformation as they are invested in the subject.

KW - Conventional femininity

KW - Criminal law

KW - Discourse

KW - Knowledge

KW - Normalisation

KW - Power

KW - Practice of shame

KW - Strength

KW - Methodology

KW - Weakness

KW - Violence

U2 - 10.1007/s10991-008-9037-6

DO - 10.1007/s10991-008-9037-6

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 123

EP - 142

JO - Liverpool Law Review

JF - Liverpool Law Review

SN - 0144-932X

IS - 2

ER -