Comparison of miniplates and reconstruction plates in mandibular reconstruction

R. Shaw, A. Kanatas, D. Lowe, J. Brown, S. Rogers, E. Vaughan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. The aim of this study is to compare complication rates of miniplates versus reconstruction plates in the fixation of vascularized grafts into segmental mandibular defects. Methods. Retrospective analysis of 143 consecutive successful microvascular composite flaps performed between 1993 and 2001 was performed. Data were gathered from a computerized database, case notes and pathology reports. Complications were classified as dehiscence, infection, plate or bone removal. Results. In the series, 49% of patients received miniplates, and 51% received plates. No significant differences in complication rates were found between those grafts fixed with miniplates (27%) and those with reconstruction plates (30%). Plate choice was primarily determined by consultant preference. No significant differences were found in patient, defect, treatrnent, or follow-up characteristics between the plate groups. Twenty-nine percent of patients had at least one late complication at the reconstructed site, and this was higher (39%) in those who had postoperative radiotherapy. Conclusions. No evidence was found in this study that the increased rigidity offered by reconstruction plates influences the rate of plate or bone removal, infection, or plate exposure. Thus, the decision to use reconstruction or miniplates is not dependent on the rate of plate complications.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)456-463
JournalHead & Neck
Volume26
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2004

Fingerprint

Mandibular Reconstruction
Bone Plates
Transplants
Consultants
Infection
Radiotherapy
Databases
Pathology

Cite this

Shaw, R., Kanatas, A., Lowe, D., Brown, J., Rogers, S., & Vaughan, E. (2004). Comparison of miniplates and reconstruction plates in mandibular reconstruction. Head & Neck, 26(5), 456-463. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.10343
Shaw, R. ; Kanatas, A. ; Lowe, D. ; Brown, J. ; Rogers, S. ; Vaughan, E. / Comparison of miniplates and reconstruction plates in mandibular reconstruction. In: Head & Neck. 2004 ; Vol. 26, No. 5. pp. 456-463.
@article{fea2067900a14178a146018564870bea,
title = "Comparison of miniplates and reconstruction plates in mandibular reconstruction",
abstract = "Background. The aim of this study is to compare complication rates of miniplates versus reconstruction plates in the fixation of vascularized grafts into segmental mandibular defects. Methods. Retrospective analysis of 143 consecutive successful microvascular composite flaps performed between 1993 and 2001 was performed. Data were gathered from a computerized database, case notes and pathology reports. Complications were classified as dehiscence, infection, plate or bone removal. Results. In the series, 49{\%} of patients received miniplates, and 51{\%} received plates. No significant differences in complication rates were found between those grafts fixed with miniplates (27{\%}) and those with reconstruction plates (30{\%}). Plate choice was primarily determined by consultant preference. No significant differences were found in patient, defect, treatrnent, or follow-up characteristics between the plate groups. Twenty-nine percent of patients had at least one late complication at the reconstructed site, and this was higher (39{\%}) in those who had postoperative radiotherapy. Conclusions. No evidence was found in this study that the increased rigidity offered by reconstruction plates influences the rate of plate or bone removal, infection, or plate exposure. Thus, the decision to use reconstruction or miniplates is not dependent on the rate of plate complications.",
author = "R. Shaw and A. Kanatas and D. Lowe and J. Brown and S. Rogers and E. Vaughan",
year = "2004",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1002/hed.10343",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "456--463",
journal = "Head and Neck",
issn = "1043-3074",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "5",

}

Shaw, R, Kanatas, A, Lowe, D, Brown, J, Rogers, S & Vaughan, E 2004, 'Comparison of miniplates and reconstruction plates in mandibular reconstruction', Head & Neck, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 456-463. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.10343

Comparison of miniplates and reconstruction plates in mandibular reconstruction. / Shaw, R.; Kanatas, A.; Lowe, D.; Brown, J.; Rogers, S.; Vaughan, E.

In: Head & Neck, Vol. 26, No. 5, 05.2004, p. 456-463.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of miniplates and reconstruction plates in mandibular reconstruction

AU - Shaw, R.

AU - Kanatas, A.

AU - Lowe, D.

AU - Brown, J.

AU - Rogers, S.

AU - Vaughan, E.

PY - 2004/5

Y1 - 2004/5

N2 - Background. The aim of this study is to compare complication rates of miniplates versus reconstruction plates in the fixation of vascularized grafts into segmental mandibular defects. Methods. Retrospective analysis of 143 consecutive successful microvascular composite flaps performed between 1993 and 2001 was performed. Data were gathered from a computerized database, case notes and pathology reports. Complications were classified as dehiscence, infection, plate or bone removal. Results. In the series, 49% of patients received miniplates, and 51% received plates. No significant differences in complication rates were found between those grafts fixed with miniplates (27%) and those with reconstruction plates (30%). Plate choice was primarily determined by consultant preference. No significant differences were found in patient, defect, treatrnent, or follow-up characteristics between the plate groups. Twenty-nine percent of patients had at least one late complication at the reconstructed site, and this was higher (39%) in those who had postoperative radiotherapy. Conclusions. No evidence was found in this study that the increased rigidity offered by reconstruction plates influences the rate of plate or bone removal, infection, or plate exposure. Thus, the decision to use reconstruction or miniplates is not dependent on the rate of plate complications.

AB - Background. The aim of this study is to compare complication rates of miniplates versus reconstruction plates in the fixation of vascularized grafts into segmental mandibular defects. Methods. Retrospective analysis of 143 consecutive successful microvascular composite flaps performed between 1993 and 2001 was performed. Data were gathered from a computerized database, case notes and pathology reports. Complications were classified as dehiscence, infection, plate or bone removal. Results. In the series, 49% of patients received miniplates, and 51% received plates. No significant differences in complication rates were found between those grafts fixed with miniplates (27%) and those with reconstruction plates (30%). Plate choice was primarily determined by consultant preference. No significant differences were found in patient, defect, treatrnent, or follow-up characteristics between the plate groups. Twenty-nine percent of patients had at least one late complication at the reconstructed site, and this was higher (39%) in those who had postoperative radiotherapy. Conclusions. No evidence was found in this study that the increased rigidity offered by reconstruction plates influences the rate of plate or bone removal, infection, or plate exposure. Thus, the decision to use reconstruction or miniplates is not dependent on the rate of plate complications.

U2 - 10.1002/hed.10343

DO - 10.1002/hed.10343

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 456

EP - 463

JO - Head and Neck

JF - Head and Neck

SN - 1043-3074

IS - 5

ER -

Shaw R, Kanatas A, Lowe D, Brown J, Rogers S, Vaughan E. Comparison of miniplates and reconstruction plates in mandibular reconstruction. Head & Neck. 2004 May;26(5):456-463. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.10343