TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of effective dose and lifetime risk of cancer incidence of CT attenuation correction acquisitions and radiopharmaceutical administration for myocardial perfusion imaging
AU - Tootell, A. K.
AU - Szczepura, K.
AU - Hogg, P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 The Authors.
PY - 2014/9/1
Y1 - 2014/9/1
N2 - Objective: To measure the organ dose and calculate effective dose from CT attenuation correction (CTAC) acquisitions from four commonly used gamma camera single photon emission CT/CT systems.Methods: CTAC dosimetry data was collected using thermoluminescent dosemeters on GE Healthcare's Infinia™ Hawkeye™ (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) four- and single-slice systems, Siemens Symbia™ T6 (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) and the Philips Precedence (Philips Healthcare, Amsterdam, Netherlands). Organ and effective dose from the administration of 99mTc-tetrofosmin and 99mTc-sestamibi were calculated using International Commission of Radiological Protection reports 80 and 106. Using these data, the lifetime biological risk was calculated.Results: The Siemens Symbia gave the lowest CTAC dose (1.8mSv) followed by the GE Infinia Hawkeye single- slice (1.9mSv), GE Infinia Hawkeye four-slice (2.5mSv) and Philips Precedence v. 3.0. Doses were significantly lower than the calculated doses from radiopharmaceutical administration (11 and 14mSv for 99mTc-tetrofosmin and 99mTc-sestamibi, respectively). Overall lifetime biological risks were lower, which suggests that using CTAC data posed minimal risk to the patient. Comparison of data for breast tissue demonstrated a higher risk than that from the radiopharmaceutical administration.Conclusion: CTAC doses were confirmed to be much lower than those from radiopharmaceutical administration. The localized nature of the CTAC exposure compared to the radiopharmaceutical biological distribution indicated dose and risk to the breast to be higher.Advances in knowledge: This research proved that CTAC is a comparatively low-dose acquisition. However, it has been shown that there is increased risk for breast tissue especially in the younger patients. As per legislation, justification is required and CTAC should only be used in situations that demonstrate sufficient net benefit.
AB - Objective: To measure the organ dose and calculate effective dose from CT attenuation correction (CTAC) acquisitions from four commonly used gamma camera single photon emission CT/CT systems.Methods: CTAC dosimetry data was collected using thermoluminescent dosemeters on GE Healthcare's Infinia™ Hawkeye™ (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) four- and single-slice systems, Siemens Symbia™ T6 (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) and the Philips Precedence (Philips Healthcare, Amsterdam, Netherlands). Organ and effective dose from the administration of 99mTc-tetrofosmin and 99mTc-sestamibi were calculated using International Commission of Radiological Protection reports 80 and 106. Using these data, the lifetime biological risk was calculated.Results: The Siemens Symbia gave the lowest CTAC dose (1.8mSv) followed by the GE Infinia Hawkeye single- slice (1.9mSv), GE Infinia Hawkeye four-slice (2.5mSv) and Philips Precedence v. 3.0. Doses were significantly lower than the calculated doses from radiopharmaceutical administration (11 and 14mSv for 99mTc-tetrofosmin and 99mTc-sestamibi, respectively). Overall lifetime biological risks were lower, which suggests that using CTAC data posed minimal risk to the patient. Comparison of data for breast tissue demonstrated a higher risk than that from the radiopharmaceutical administration.Conclusion: CTAC doses were confirmed to be much lower than those from radiopharmaceutical administration. The localized nature of the CTAC exposure compared to the radiopharmaceutical biological distribution indicated dose and risk to the breast to be higher.Advances in knowledge: This research proved that CTAC is a comparatively low-dose acquisition. However, it has been shown that there is increased risk for breast tissue especially in the younger patients. As per legislation, justification is required and CTAC should only be used in situations that demonstrate sufficient net benefit.
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Incidence
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Myocardial Perfusion Imaging/adverse effects
KW - Neoplasms/epidemiology
KW - Netherlands
KW - Organophosphorus Compounds/adverse effects
KW - Organotechnetium Compounds/adverse effects
KW - Radiometry/methods
KW - Radiopharmaceuticals/adverse effects
KW - Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi/adverse effects
KW - Thermoluminescent Dosimetry
KW - Tomography, X-Ray Computed/adverse effects
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907495060&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907495060&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/fedb7530-fa61-3e65-b88b-394d2ff49cf7/
U2 - 10.1259/bjr.20140110
DO - 10.1259/bjr.20140110
M3 - Article (journal)
C2 - 24998249
AN - SCOPUS:84907495060
SN - 0007-1285
VL - 87
JO - British Journal of Radiology
JF - British Journal of Radiology
IS - 1041
M1 - 20140110
ER -