TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical reasoning—the essentials for teaching medical students, trainees and non-medical healthcare professionals
AU - Jay, Robert
AU - Davenport, Clare
AU - Patel, Rakesh
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s).
PY - 2024/7/24
Y1 - 2024/7/24
N2 - Clinical reasoning is fundamental for effective clinical practice. Traditional consultation models for teaching clinical reasoning or conventional approaches for teaching students how to make a diagnosis or management plan that rely on learning through observation only, are increasingly recognised as insufficient. There are also many challenges to supporting learners in developing clinical reasoning over time as well as across different clinical presentations and contexts. These challenges are compounded by the differences in how experts and novices make sense of clinical information, and the different cognitive processes each use when processing and communicating this information using precise medical language. Diagnostic errors may be due to cognitive biases but also, in a majority of cases, due to a lack of clinical knowledge. Therefore, effective educational strategies to develop clinical reasoning include identifying learners’ knowledge gaps, using worked examples to prevent cognitive overload, promoting the use of key features and practising the construction of accurate problem representations. Deliberate reflection on diagnostic justification is also recommended, and overall, contributes to a growing number of evidence-based and theory-driven educational interventions for reducing diagnostic errors and improving patient care.
AB - Clinical reasoning is fundamental for effective clinical practice. Traditional consultation models for teaching clinical reasoning or conventional approaches for teaching students how to make a diagnosis or management plan that rely on learning through observation only, are increasingly recognised as insufficient. There are also many challenges to supporting learners in developing clinical reasoning over time as well as across different clinical presentations and contexts. These challenges are compounded by the differences in how experts and novices make sense of clinical information, and the different cognitive processes each use when processing and communicating this information using precise medical language. Diagnostic errors may be due to cognitive biases but also, in a majority of cases, due to a lack of clinical knowledge. Therefore, effective educational strategies to develop clinical reasoning include identifying learners’ knowledge gaps, using worked examples to prevent cognitive overload, promoting the use of key features and practising the construction of accurate problem representations. Deliberate reflection on diagnostic justification is also recommended, and overall, contributes to a growing number of evidence-based and theory-driven educational interventions for reducing diagnostic errors and improving patient care.
KW - Clinical reasoning
KW - Medical education
KW - Diagnostic accuracy
KW - Diagnostic error
KW - Cognitive bias
KW - Clinical Competence
KW - Students, Medical - psychology
KW - Humans
KW - Clinical Reasoning
KW - Teaching
KW - Education, Medical - methods
KW - Diagnostic Errors - prevention & control
KW - Health Personnel - education
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85200159485&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85200159485&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/edf24ee1-bf7b-325d-9f8e-e5e4c964988c/
U2 - 10.12968/hmed.2024.0052
DO - 10.12968/hmed.2024.0052
M3 - Article (journal)
SN - 1750-8460
VL - 85
SP - 1
EP - 8
JO - British Journal of Hospital Medicine
JF - British Journal of Hospital Medicine
IS - 7
ER -