Clinical measures of static foot posture do not agree

Ben Langley, Mary Cramp, Stuart Morrison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the level of agreement between common clinical foot classification measures. Methods: Static foot assessment was undertaken using the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6), rearfoot angle (RFA), medial longitudinal arch angle (MLAA) and navicular drop (ND) in 30 participants (29 ± 6 years, 1.72 ± 0.08 m, 75 ± 18 kg). The right foot was measured on two occasions by one rater within the same test environment. Agreement between the test sessions was initially determined for each measure using the Weighted Kappa. Agreement between the measures was determined using Fleiss Kappa. Results: Foot classification across the two test occasions was almost perfect for MLAA (Kw = .92) and FPI-6 (Kw = .92), moderate for RFA (Kw = .60) and fair for ND (Kw = .40) for comparison within the measures. Overall agreement between the measures for foot classification was moderate (Kf = .58). Conclusion: The findings reported in this study highlight discrepancies between the chosen foot classification measures. The FPI-6 was a reliable multiplanar measure whereas navicular drop emerged as an unreliable measure with only fair agreement across test sessions. The use of this measure for foot assessment is discouraged. The lack of strong consensus between measures for foot classification underpins the need for a consensus on appropriate clinical measures of foot structure.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Foot and Ankle Research
Volume9
Issue number45
Early online date1 Dec 2016
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 1 Dec 2016

Fingerprint

Posture
Foot

Keywords

  • Morphology
  • pes planus
  • pes cavus
  • Foot classification
  • Agreement

Cite this

Langley, Ben ; Cramp, Mary ; Morrison, Stuart. / Clinical measures of static foot posture do not agree. In: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research. 2016 ; Vol. 9, No. 45.
@article{6bc24000687c455ea4f7beab4fbf41e4,
title = "Clinical measures of static foot posture do not agree",
abstract = "Background: The aim of this study was to determine the level of agreement between common clinical foot classification measures. Methods: Static foot assessment was undertaken using the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6), rearfoot angle (RFA), medial longitudinal arch angle (MLAA) and navicular drop (ND) in 30 participants (29 ± 6 years, 1.72 ± 0.08 m, 75 ± 18 kg). The right foot was measured on two occasions by one rater within the same test environment. Agreement between the test sessions was initially determined for each measure using the Weighted Kappa. Agreement between the measures was determined using Fleiss Kappa. Results: Foot classification across the two test occasions was almost perfect for MLAA (Kw = .92) and FPI-6 (Kw = .92), moderate for RFA (Kw = .60) and fair for ND (Kw = .40) for comparison within the measures. Overall agreement between the measures for foot classification was moderate (Kf = .58). Conclusion: The findings reported in this study highlight discrepancies between the chosen foot classification measures. The FPI-6 was a reliable multiplanar measure whereas navicular drop emerged as an unreliable measure with only fair agreement across test sessions. The use of this measure for foot assessment is discouraged. The lack of strong consensus between measures for foot classification underpins the need for a consensus on appropriate clinical measures of foot structure.",
keywords = "Morphology, pes planus, pes cavus, Foot classification, Agreement",
author = "Ben Langley and Mary Cramp and Stuart Morrison",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1186/s13047-016-0180-3",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Journal of Foot and Ankle Research",
issn = "1757-1146",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "45",

}

Clinical measures of static foot posture do not agree. / Langley, Ben; Cramp, Mary; Morrison, Stuart.

In: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, Vol. 9, No. 45, 01.12.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical measures of static foot posture do not agree

AU - Langley, Ben

AU - Cramp, Mary

AU - Morrison, Stuart

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Background: The aim of this study was to determine the level of agreement between common clinical foot classification measures. Methods: Static foot assessment was undertaken using the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6), rearfoot angle (RFA), medial longitudinal arch angle (MLAA) and navicular drop (ND) in 30 participants (29 ± 6 years, 1.72 ± 0.08 m, 75 ± 18 kg). The right foot was measured on two occasions by one rater within the same test environment. Agreement between the test sessions was initially determined for each measure using the Weighted Kappa. Agreement between the measures was determined using Fleiss Kappa. Results: Foot classification across the two test occasions was almost perfect for MLAA (Kw = .92) and FPI-6 (Kw = .92), moderate for RFA (Kw = .60) and fair for ND (Kw = .40) for comparison within the measures. Overall agreement between the measures for foot classification was moderate (Kf = .58). Conclusion: The findings reported in this study highlight discrepancies between the chosen foot classification measures. The FPI-6 was a reliable multiplanar measure whereas navicular drop emerged as an unreliable measure with only fair agreement across test sessions. The use of this measure for foot assessment is discouraged. The lack of strong consensus between measures for foot classification underpins the need for a consensus on appropriate clinical measures of foot structure.

AB - Background: The aim of this study was to determine the level of agreement between common clinical foot classification measures. Methods: Static foot assessment was undertaken using the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6), rearfoot angle (RFA), medial longitudinal arch angle (MLAA) and navicular drop (ND) in 30 participants (29 ± 6 years, 1.72 ± 0.08 m, 75 ± 18 kg). The right foot was measured on two occasions by one rater within the same test environment. Agreement between the test sessions was initially determined for each measure using the Weighted Kappa. Agreement between the measures was determined using Fleiss Kappa. Results: Foot classification across the two test occasions was almost perfect for MLAA (Kw = .92) and FPI-6 (Kw = .92), moderate for RFA (Kw = .60) and fair for ND (Kw = .40) for comparison within the measures. Overall agreement between the measures for foot classification was moderate (Kf = .58). Conclusion: The findings reported in this study highlight discrepancies between the chosen foot classification measures. The FPI-6 was a reliable multiplanar measure whereas navicular drop emerged as an unreliable measure with only fair agreement across test sessions. The use of this measure for foot assessment is discouraged. The lack of strong consensus between measures for foot classification underpins the need for a consensus on appropriate clinical measures of foot structure.

KW - Morphology

KW - pes planus

KW - pes cavus

KW - Foot classification

KW - Agreement

UR - https://jfootankleres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13047- 016-0180-3

U2 - 10.1186/s13047-016-0180-3

DO - 10.1186/s13047-016-0180-3

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - Journal of Foot and Ankle Research

JF - Journal of Foot and Ankle Research

SN - 1757-1146

IS - 45

ER -