TY - GEN
T1 - Client Buffering Considerations for Video Streaming
AU - Pereira, Rubem
AU - Pereira, Ella
N1 - [1]J. Guo, E. W. M. Wong, S. Chan, P. Taylor, M.
Zukerman, and K. S.Tang, ‘‘Performance analysis of
resource selection schemes for a large scale video-ondemand
system,’’ IEEE Trans. Multimedia, vol. 10, no.1, pp.
153--159, Jan. 2008.
[2]Yung Ryn Choe, Chase Douglas, and Vijay S. Pai “A
Model and Prototype of a Resource-Efficient Storage Server
for High-Bitrate Video-on-Demand” IEEE International
parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, pp397-404,
2007
Video Mean bit rate Peak bit rate Peak/Mean
A 280 Kbps 1.9 Mbps 6.81
B 270 Kbps 1.7 Mbps 6.36
[3]J. Guo, S. Chan, P. Taylor, M. Zukerman, K. Tang,
“Combination Load Balancing for Video-on-Demand
Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for
Video Technology, Vol 18, No 7, pp 937-948, July 2008
[4]TS Chua, J Li, BC Ooi, KL Tan, “Disk Stripping
Strategies for Large Video-on-Demand Servers,” The Fourth
ACM International Multimedia Conference, Boston, MA, pp.
297-306, 1996
[5]B. Ozden, R Rastoli, A Silberschatz.: “On the design of a
low-cost video-on-demand storage system,”Multimedia Syst.,
4, 1, pp. 40-54, 1996
[6]P Sumari, M Merabti, R Pereira, “Video on Demand
Server: Strategy for Improving Performance”, IEE
Proceedings- Software, Vol 146, No 1, pp 33-37, Feb 1999
[7]W. Tang et al., ‘‘Optimal Video Placement Scheme for
Batching VoD Services,’’ IEEE Trans. Broadcasting, vol. 50,
pp. 16--25, Mar. 2004
[8]R. Shah, P. J. Varman, and J. S. Vitter. ‘‘Online
algorithms for prefetching and caching on parallel disks.’’
Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Parallelism in
Algorithms and Architectures, 2004.
[9]Y.W. Leung and R.Y.T. Hou, “Assignment of Movies to
Heterogeneous Video Servers,” IEEE Trans. Systems, Man,
and Cybernetics , vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 665-681, Sept. 2005.
[10]R. Pereira, E. Grishikashvili, O. Ajeyi “ Efficient Realtime
Packet Scheduling for Smoothed Video Streams”,
International Journal of Simulation, Volume 8, Number 3,
pp 47-60, 2007
[11]Bewick C., Pereira R., and Merabti M. “Admission
Control and Routing of Smoothed Video Streams”,
International Journal of Simulation, Systems, Science and
Technology, Vol. 6, Numbers 3-4, pp. 61-68, 2005.
[12]Salehi J., Zhang Z., Kurose J., Twosley D., “Supporting
Stored Video: Reducing Rate Variability and End-to-End
Resource Requirements Through Optimal Smoothing”.
IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, 6(4).Pp 397-410, 1998
[13]Rao S.G. and Raghavan S.V. 1999, “Fast Techniques for
the Optimal Smoothing of Stored Video”. Multimedia
Systems, 7(3): p. 222-233, 1999
[14]Hadar O. and Cohen R. “PCRTT Enhancement for offline
Video Smoothing.” The Journal of Real Time Imaging,
June 2001 7(3).Pp 301-314, 2001
[15]Fitzek F.H.P. and Reisslein M , “MPEG-4 and H.263
Video Traces for Network Performance Evaluation.” IEEE
Network, Dec. 2001, 15(6). Pp 40-54, 2001
[16]A Rao, YS Lim, C Barakat, A Legout, D Towsley and W
Dabbous, “Network Characteristics of Video Streaming
Traffic”, ACM CoNEXT, 2011
[17]VK Adhikari, S Jain, Y Chen and ZL Zhang,
“Vivisecting YouTube: An Active Measurement Study”
Proceedings of INFOCOM 2012
[18]J Summers, T Brecht, D Eager and B Wong, “ To Chunk
or not to Chunk: Implications for HTTP Streaming Video
Server Performance”, Proceedings of NOSSDAV’12, 2012
[19]L Plissoneau and E Biersack, “A Longitudinal View of
HTTP Video Streaming Performance”, Proceedings of the 3rd
Multimedia Systems Conference, MMSys’12, 2012
[20]M Ghobadi, Y Cheng, A Jain, M Mathis, “Trickle: Rate
Limiting YouTube Video Streaming”, Proceedings of
USENIX 2012.
PY - 2013/3
Y1 - 2013/3
N2 - An important issue in the performance of Video Streaming systems is the data transmission mechanism used by the server. Streaming servers can use a variety of techniques, which have an impact on a number of metrics associated with the performance and the quality of the video presentation.
One of the related issues is the assignment of buffer space at the client in order to hold data that has arrived earlier than their playback time. In this article, we conduct a number of experiments with MPEG-4 compressed video, in order to obtain buffering occupancy values for various transmission mechanisms. In particular, we consider some of the mechanisms used by YouTube video servers, and contrast their performance with that of other mechanisms.
AB - An important issue in the performance of Video Streaming systems is the data transmission mechanism used by the server. Streaming servers can use a variety of techniques, which have an impact on a number of metrics associated with the performance and the quality of the video presentation.
One of the related issues is the assignment of buffer space at the client in order to hold data that has arrived earlier than their playback time. In this article, we conduct a number of experiments with MPEG-4 compressed video, in order to obtain buffering occupancy values for various transmission mechanisms. In particular, we consider some of the mechanisms used by YouTube video servers, and contrast their performance with that of other mechanisms.
U2 - 10.1109/WAINA.2013.69
DO - 10.1109/WAINA.2013.69
M3 - Conference proceeding (ISBN)
SN - 978-1-4673-6239-9
SP - 595
EP - 600
BT - Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA), 2013 27th International Conference on
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
T2 - IEEE 27th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA)
Y2 - 25 March 2013 through 28 March 2013
ER -