Capacity Building in the Voluntary and Community Sectors Towards Relative Independence — Limits and Possibilities

J. Diamond

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The UK Government's National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal (2001) identified ways in which the voluntary and community sectors are to be supported in developing their `capacity'. We can begin to reflect on current practice and experience and identify early trends. This article will draw on a completed evaluation of the development of a community centre funded via the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). It had as its remit that of increasing local capacity in the community and supporting new employment opportunities. The initiative established a local partnership that had a significant number of local residents and tenants on the management board. The article will suggest that while both the model developed and the expertise of those involved have a number of positive features there are important policy and practice issues still to be resolved. In particular, we need to be clear about both the intended (and unstated) assumptions surrounding `capacity building' and the potential limits to local or neighbourhood partnerships, and the real conflicts of interests they contain. Specifically, we need to think more clearly about securing relative independence for such initiatives, and what this may mean for all parties involved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)153-166
JournalPublic Policy and Administration
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2008

Fingerprint

community
community center
conflict of interest
employment opportunity
regional development
expertise
resident
trend
evaluation
management
experience

Cite this

@article{06a171a14fd34c62a23ddcc0f5ac7b19,
title = "Capacity Building in the Voluntary and Community Sectors Towards Relative Independence — Limits and Possibilities",
abstract = "The UK Government's National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal (2001) identified ways in which the voluntary and community sectors are to be supported in developing their `capacity'. We can begin to reflect on current practice and experience and identify early trends. This article will draw on a completed evaluation of the development of a community centre funded via the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). It had as its remit that of increasing local capacity in the community and supporting new employment opportunities. The initiative established a local partnership that had a significant number of local residents and tenants on the management board. The article will suggest that while both the model developed and the expertise of those involved have a number of positive features there are important policy and practice issues still to be resolved. In particular, we need to be clear about both the intended (and unstated) assumptions surrounding `capacity building' and the potential limits to local or neighbourhood partnerships, and the real conflicts of interests they contain. Specifically, we need to think more clearly about securing relative independence for such initiatives, and what this may mean for all parties involved.",
author = "J. Diamond",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1177/0952076707086253",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "153--166",
journal = "Public Policy and Administration",
issn = "0952-0767",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "2",

}

Capacity Building in the Voluntary and Community Sectors Towards Relative Independence — Limits and Possibilities. / Diamond, J.

In: Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 23, No. 2, 04.2008, p. 153-166.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Capacity Building in the Voluntary and Community Sectors Towards Relative Independence — Limits and Possibilities

AU - Diamond, J.

PY - 2008/4

Y1 - 2008/4

N2 - The UK Government's National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal (2001) identified ways in which the voluntary and community sectors are to be supported in developing their `capacity'. We can begin to reflect on current practice and experience and identify early trends. This article will draw on a completed evaluation of the development of a community centre funded via the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). It had as its remit that of increasing local capacity in the community and supporting new employment opportunities. The initiative established a local partnership that had a significant number of local residents and tenants on the management board. The article will suggest that while both the model developed and the expertise of those involved have a number of positive features there are important policy and practice issues still to be resolved. In particular, we need to be clear about both the intended (and unstated) assumptions surrounding `capacity building' and the potential limits to local or neighbourhood partnerships, and the real conflicts of interests they contain. Specifically, we need to think more clearly about securing relative independence for such initiatives, and what this may mean for all parties involved.

AB - The UK Government's National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal (2001) identified ways in which the voluntary and community sectors are to be supported in developing their `capacity'. We can begin to reflect on current practice and experience and identify early trends. This article will draw on a completed evaluation of the development of a community centre funded via the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). It had as its remit that of increasing local capacity in the community and supporting new employment opportunities. The initiative established a local partnership that had a significant number of local residents and tenants on the management board. The article will suggest that while both the model developed and the expertise of those involved have a number of positive features there are important policy and practice issues still to be resolved. In particular, we need to be clear about both the intended (and unstated) assumptions surrounding `capacity building' and the potential limits to local or neighbourhood partnerships, and the real conflicts of interests they contain. Specifically, we need to think more clearly about securing relative independence for such initiatives, and what this may mean for all parties involved.

U2 - 10.1177/0952076707086253

DO - 10.1177/0952076707086253

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 153

EP - 166

JO - Public Policy and Administration

JF - Public Policy and Administration

SN - 0952-0767

IS - 2

ER -