Can we meet their expectations? Experiences and perceptions of feedback in first year undergraduate students

Sarita Robinson, Debbie Pope, Lynda Holyoak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Student ratings of satisfaction with feedback are consistently lower than other teaching and learning elements within the UK higher education sector. However, reasons for this dissatisfaction are often unclear to teaching staff, who believe their students are receiving timely, extensive and informative feedback. This study explores possible explanations for this mismatch between staff and students’ perceptions of feedback quality. One hundred and sixty-six first year undergraduate students completed a questionnaire detailing their experiences of feedback on coursework before and throughout their first year at university. Results indicate that whilst procedural elements of feedback (timeliness and legibility) are considered satisfactory, past experiences (pre-university) may influence student expectations of feedback. Some students had a severe, negative emotional response to the feedback provided and few students engaged in self-help (independent learning) behaviours to improve their performance following feedback. We consider how changes in feedback practices could improve students’ use of, and satisfaction with, their feedback.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)260-272
JournalAssessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

experience
student
learning behavior
university
self-help
mismatch
rating
staff
questionnaire
Teaching
learning
performance
education

Cite this

@article{cf91b90b1188436292d3af3fac444b97,
title = "Can we meet their expectations? Experiences and perceptions of feedback in first year undergraduate students",
abstract = "Student ratings of satisfaction with feedback are consistently lower than other teaching and learning elements within the UK higher education sector. However, reasons for this dissatisfaction are often unclear to teaching staff, who believe their students are receiving timely, extensive and informative feedback. This study explores possible explanations for this mismatch between staff and students’ perceptions of feedback quality. One hundred and sixty-six first year undergraduate students completed a questionnaire detailing their experiences of feedback on coursework before and throughout their first year at university. Results indicate that whilst procedural elements of feedback (timeliness and legibility) are considered satisfactory, past experiences (pre-university) may influence student expectations of feedback. Some students had a severe, negative emotional response to the feedback provided and few students engaged in self-help (independent learning) behaviours to improve their performance following feedback. We consider how changes in feedback practices could improve students’ use of, and satisfaction with, their feedback.",
author = "Sarita Robinson and Debbie Pope and Lynda Holyoak",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1080/02602938.2011.629291",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "260--272",
journal = "Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education",
issn = "0260-2938",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

Can we meet their expectations? Experiences and perceptions of feedback in first year undergraduate students. / Robinson, Sarita; Pope, Debbie; Holyoak, Lynda.

In: Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 38, No. 3, 04.2013, p. 260-272.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can we meet their expectations? Experiences and perceptions of feedback in first year undergraduate students

AU - Robinson, Sarita

AU - Pope, Debbie

AU - Holyoak, Lynda

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Student ratings of satisfaction with feedback are consistently lower than other teaching and learning elements within the UK higher education sector. However, reasons for this dissatisfaction are often unclear to teaching staff, who believe their students are receiving timely, extensive and informative feedback. This study explores possible explanations for this mismatch between staff and students’ perceptions of feedback quality. One hundred and sixty-six first year undergraduate students completed a questionnaire detailing their experiences of feedback on coursework before and throughout their first year at university. Results indicate that whilst procedural elements of feedback (timeliness and legibility) are considered satisfactory, past experiences (pre-university) may influence student expectations of feedback. Some students had a severe, negative emotional response to the feedback provided and few students engaged in self-help (independent learning) behaviours to improve their performance following feedback. We consider how changes in feedback practices could improve students’ use of, and satisfaction with, their feedback.

AB - Student ratings of satisfaction with feedback are consistently lower than other teaching and learning elements within the UK higher education sector. However, reasons for this dissatisfaction are often unclear to teaching staff, who believe their students are receiving timely, extensive and informative feedback. This study explores possible explanations for this mismatch between staff and students’ perceptions of feedback quality. One hundred and sixty-six first year undergraduate students completed a questionnaire detailing their experiences of feedback on coursework before and throughout their first year at university. Results indicate that whilst procedural elements of feedback (timeliness and legibility) are considered satisfactory, past experiences (pre-university) may influence student expectations of feedback. Some students had a severe, negative emotional response to the feedback provided and few students engaged in self-help (independent learning) behaviours to improve their performance following feedback. We consider how changes in feedback practices could improve students’ use of, and satisfaction with, their feedback.

U2 - 10.1080/02602938.2011.629291

DO - 10.1080/02602938.2011.629291

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 260

EP - 272

JO - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

JF - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

SN - 0260-2938

IS - 3

ER -