Bystander Reaction to Women Fighting: Developing a Theory of Intervention

Robert D. Lowe, Mark Levine, Rachel M. Best, Derek Heim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article explores accounts of bystanders to female-on-female public violence. Group interviews with participants in the night-time economy are carried out. Whereas men tend to respond to the discussion topic of female-on-female violence with laughter, this laughter reveals ambivalence and discomfort as much as amusement. Men seem to negotiate the tension between the expectation that they should intervene in emergencies and a catalogue of costs that attend intervention. Female bystanders appear to have a different set of concerns. They talk about feelings of shame at the interpersonal and the group level. Women cite the public spectacle, and the opportunity for men to demean or sexualize women, as reasons for intervention. The article concludes with some recommendations about the importance of exploring female violence in its own terms, beginning with a series of identified moral and social dilemmas incurred within possible third-party intervention.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1802-1826
JournalJournal of Interpersonal Violence
Volume27
Issue number9
Early online date18 Jan 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2012

Keywords

  • gender
  • public violence
  • laughter
  • shame
  • bystander intervention

Cite this

Lowe, Robert D. ; Levine, Mark ; Best, Rachel M. ; Heim, Derek. / Bystander Reaction to Women Fighting: Developing a Theory of Intervention. In: Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2012 ; Vol. 27, No. 9. pp. 1802-1826.
@article{e6005813e0964e4096d1e089287f5535,
title = "Bystander Reaction to Women Fighting: Developing a Theory of Intervention",
abstract = "This article explores accounts of bystanders to female-on-female public violence. Group interviews with participants in the night-time economy are carried out. Whereas men tend to respond to the discussion topic of female-on-female violence with laughter, this laughter reveals ambivalence and discomfort as much as amusement. Men seem to negotiate the tension between the expectation that they should intervene in emergencies and a catalogue of costs that attend intervention. Female bystanders appear to have a different set of concerns. They talk about feelings of shame at the interpersonal and the group level. Women cite the public spectacle, and the opportunity for men to demean or sexualize women, as reasons for intervention. The article concludes with some recommendations about the importance of exploring female violence in its own terms, beginning with a series of identified moral and social dilemmas incurred within possible third-party intervention.",
keywords = "gender, public violence, laughter, shame, bystander intervention",
author = "Lowe, {Robert D.} and Mark Levine and Best, {Rachel M.} and Derek Heim",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0886260511430393",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "1802--1826",
journal = "Journal of Interpersonal Violence",
issn = "0886-2605",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "9",

}

Bystander Reaction to Women Fighting: Developing a Theory of Intervention. / Lowe, Robert D.; Levine, Mark; Best, Rachel M.; Heim, Derek.

In: Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 27, No. 9, 01.06.2012, p. 1802-1826.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bystander Reaction to Women Fighting: Developing a Theory of Intervention

AU - Lowe, Robert D.

AU - Levine, Mark

AU - Best, Rachel M.

AU - Heim, Derek

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

N2 - This article explores accounts of bystanders to female-on-female public violence. Group interviews with participants in the night-time economy are carried out. Whereas men tend to respond to the discussion topic of female-on-female violence with laughter, this laughter reveals ambivalence and discomfort as much as amusement. Men seem to negotiate the tension between the expectation that they should intervene in emergencies and a catalogue of costs that attend intervention. Female bystanders appear to have a different set of concerns. They talk about feelings of shame at the interpersonal and the group level. Women cite the public spectacle, and the opportunity for men to demean or sexualize women, as reasons for intervention. The article concludes with some recommendations about the importance of exploring female violence in its own terms, beginning with a series of identified moral and social dilemmas incurred within possible third-party intervention.

AB - This article explores accounts of bystanders to female-on-female public violence. Group interviews with participants in the night-time economy are carried out. Whereas men tend to respond to the discussion topic of female-on-female violence with laughter, this laughter reveals ambivalence and discomfort as much as amusement. Men seem to negotiate the tension between the expectation that they should intervene in emergencies and a catalogue of costs that attend intervention. Female bystanders appear to have a different set of concerns. They talk about feelings of shame at the interpersonal and the group level. Women cite the public spectacle, and the opportunity for men to demean or sexualize women, as reasons for intervention. The article concludes with some recommendations about the importance of exploring female violence in its own terms, beginning with a series of identified moral and social dilemmas incurred within possible third-party intervention.

KW - gender

KW - public violence

KW - laughter

KW - shame

KW - bystander intervention

U2 - 10.1177/0886260511430393

DO - 10.1177/0886260511430393

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 1802

EP - 1826

JO - Journal of Interpersonal Violence

JF - Journal of Interpersonal Violence

SN - 0886-2605

IS - 9

ER -