Abstract
Purpose – The paper outlines relevant
policies on the integration of health and
social care in the four home nations:
Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and
England. The aim of the paper is to offer a
comparison of emphasis and approaches
and draw out general insights on the
implementation of integrated care policy.
Design/ Methodology/Approach – The
paper is written as a piece of critical
reflection by drawing on the authors’
knowledge and expertise and wider
evidence where available.
Findings – Since 2010 health and social
care integration has started to diverge
significantly in the four constituent
countries of the UK. Although England and
Wales have undergone considerable reorganisation
of the NHS, Scotland and
Northern Ireland have largely been
marked by organisational continuity.
However, beyond organisational
differences, policy approaches, policy
emphases and implementation strategies
have also started to show considerable
dissimilarity across the UK. An important
contributory factor may be different
ideological perspectives on the role of
competition and pilots, partnership, patient
choice and organisational incentives to
bring about change in the field.
Research implications – The paper
identifies a serious lack of comparative
research in integration policy, despite the
considerable opportunities for quasiexperimental
studies. This lack of empirical
research impedes shared learning across
the home nations.
Originality – The paper presents a
descriptive comparison of current
integration policy between health and
social care providers in the four home
nations. It reveals considerable
opportunities for further research and
comparative modelling of integration
approaches.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 84-98 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Journal of Integrated Care |
Volume | 25 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 18 Apr 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 18 Apr 2017 |