Brexit, immigration and expanded markets of social control

Steven Hirschler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (journal)peer-review

89 Downloads (Pure)


This paper explores the implications of EU citizens’ exposure to UK immigration practices currently operating on non-EU migrants in the wake of the Brexit referendum. This article draws on recent literature analysing the impact of immigration as a factor in voter decision-making during the Brexit referendum. It challenges Hollifield’s (1992) concept of the ‘liberal paradox’ through an analysis of private security firms’ roles in contributing toward the expansion of immigration control markets. The paper concludes with a review of migrant experiences within prisons, detention facilities and dispersed housing for asylum seekers. The findings suggest that the abandonment of EU citizens’ freedom of movement into the UK will result in their exposure to a privatised immigration control regime that contributes to the commodification of immigrants at the expense of human welfare. This paper provides a conceptual link between the role of immigration in the Brexit referendum and the implications of expanding the population of persons subject to immigration control to include EU immigrants. It draws on current debates about privatised social control markets to illuminate the social impact of valorising migrant bodies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)176-185
JournalSafer Communities
Issue number4
Early online date20 Sept 2017
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 20 Sept 2017


  • Brexit
  • immigration
  • public policy
  • detention
  • EU citizens
  • privatisation


Dive into the research topics of 'Brexit, immigration and expanded markets of social control'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this