Borderline sentencing: A comparison of sentencers’ decision-making in England and Wales, and Scotland

Andrew Millie, Jacqueline Tombs, Mike Hough

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article draws together findings from two related studies of sentencing in England and Wales, and Scotland. It examines how sentencers in the two jurisdictions differ in their sentencing decision making, with a focus on cases on the borderline between prison and a community penalty. The article suggests that, despite differences in legal systems and criminal justice structures, sentencers' decision making in the two jurisdictions was remarkably similar. In both jurisdictions they took account of a wide range of factors in reaching their decisions, among which the legal category of the offence under sentence was often subsidiary to other considerations. The main difference between the two jurisdictions was the much more dramatic rate of increase in the adult prison population in England and Wales than in Scotland. Several possible explanations are offered for this, including the literal and metaphorical distance of Scotland from Westminster and the greater impact of sentencing guidance south of the border—which has probably had a largely unintended inflationary effect on the prison population.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)243-267
JournalCriminology and Criminal Justice
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

jurisdiction
decision making
correctional institution
legal system
penalty
justice
offense
community

Cite this

@article{dd1aa0768eaa4dbd8b5662dba4a29aa5,
title = "Borderline sentencing: A comparison of sentencers’ decision-making in England and Wales, and Scotland",
abstract = "This article draws together findings from two related studies of sentencing in England and Wales, and Scotland. It examines how sentencers in the two jurisdictions differ in their sentencing decision making, with a focus on cases on the borderline between prison and a community penalty. The article suggests that, despite differences in legal systems and criminal justice structures, sentencers' decision making in the two jurisdictions was remarkably similar. In both jurisdictions they took account of a wide range of factors in reaching their decisions, among which the legal category of the offence under sentence was often subsidiary to other considerations. The main difference between the two jurisdictions was the much more dramatic rate of increase in the adult prison population in England and Wales than in Scotland. Several possible explanations are offered for this, including the literal and metaphorical distance of Scotland from Westminster and the greater impact of sentencing guidance south of the border—which has probably had a largely unintended inflationary effect on the prison population.",
author = "Andrew Millie and Jacqueline Tombs and Mike Hough",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1177/1748895807078866",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "243--267",
journal = "Criminology and Criminal Justice",
issn = "1748-8966",
publisher = "Sage",
number = "3",

}

Borderline sentencing: A comparison of sentencers’ decision-making in England and Wales, and Scotland. / Millie, Andrew; Tombs, Jacqueline; Hough, Mike.

In: Criminology and Criminal Justice, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2007, p. 243-267.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Borderline sentencing: A comparison of sentencers’ decision-making in England and Wales, and Scotland

AU - Millie, Andrew

AU - Tombs, Jacqueline

AU - Hough, Mike

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - This article draws together findings from two related studies of sentencing in England and Wales, and Scotland. It examines how sentencers in the two jurisdictions differ in their sentencing decision making, with a focus on cases on the borderline between prison and a community penalty. The article suggests that, despite differences in legal systems and criminal justice structures, sentencers' decision making in the two jurisdictions was remarkably similar. In both jurisdictions they took account of a wide range of factors in reaching their decisions, among which the legal category of the offence under sentence was often subsidiary to other considerations. The main difference between the two jurisdictions was the much more dramatic rate of increase in the adult prison population in England and Wales than in Scotland. Several possible explanations are offered for this, including the literal and metaphorical distance of Scotland from Westminster and the greater impact of sentencing guidance south of the border—which has probably had a largely unintended inflationary effect on the prison population.

AB - This article draws together findings from two related studies of sentencing in England and Wales, and Scotland. It examines how sentencers in the two jurisdictions differ in their sentencing decision making, with a focus on cases on the borderline between prison and a community penalty. The article suggests that, despite differences in legal systems and criminal justice structures, sentencers' decision making in the two jurisdictions was remarkably similar. In both jurisdictions they took account of a wide range of factors in reaching their decisions, among which the legal category of the offence under sentence was often subsidiary to other considerations. The main difference between the two jurisdictions was the much more dramatic rate of increase in the adult prison population in England and Wales than in Scotland. Several possible explanations are offered for this, including the literal and metaphorical distance of Scotland from Westminster and the greater impact of sentencing guidance south of the border—which has probably had a largely unintended inflationary effect on the prison population.

U2 - 10.1177/1748895807078866

DO - 10.1177/1748895807078866

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 243

EP - 267

JO - Criminology and Criminal Justice

JF - Criminology and Criminal Justice

SN - 1748-8966

IS - 3

ER -