Blame Conformity: Leading Eyewitness Statements Can Influence Attributions of Blame for an Accident

Craig Thorley, Jayne Rushton-Woods

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present experiment examined whether attributions of blame for an incident can be shifted between individuals as a result of a leading eyewitness statement. Participants watched a video of an accident involving two men and then read either a non-leading eyewitness statement that blamed no one for the accident or a leading eyewitness statement that blamed one of the two men for the accident. Participants’ attributions of blame for the accident were then assessed either immediately or after a 1 week delay. Regardless of the time delay, just over one-third of participants who read a leading statement subsequently blamed the same person as the eyewitness. In contrast, less than 4% of participants who read a non-leading statement blamed one of the men. This research is the first to demonstrate blame conformity, where blame for an incident can be shifted between individuals as a result of a leading eyewitness statement.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)291-296
JournalApplied Cognitive Psychology
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Accidents
Conformity
Eyewitness
Attribution
Research

Cite this

@article{01652d94ac794e779394e278db6d6037,
title = "Blame Conformity: Leading Eyewitness Statements Can Influence Attributions of Blame for an Accident",
abstract = "The present experiment examined whether attributions of blame for an incident can be shifted between individuals as a result of a leading eyewitness statement. Participants watched a video of an accident involving two men and then read either a non-leading eyewitness statement that blamed no one for the accident or a leading eyewitness statement that blamed one of the two men for the accident. Participants’ attributions of blame for the accident were then assessed either immediately or after a 1 week delay. Regardless of the time delay, just over one-third of participants who read a leading statement subsequently blamed the same person as the eyewitness. In contrast, less than 4{\%} of participants who read a non-leading statement blamed one of the men. This research is the first to demonstrate blame conformity, where blame for an incident can be shifted between individuals as a result of a leading eyewitness statement.",
author = "Craig Thorley and Jayne Rushton-Woods",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1002/acp.2906",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "291--296",
journal = "Applied Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "0888-4080",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "3",

}

Blame Conformity: Leading Eyewitness Statements Can Influence Attributions of Blame for an Accident. / Thorley, Craig; Rushton-Woods, Jayne.

In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2013, p. 291-296.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Blame Conformity: Leading Eyewitness Statements Can Influence Attributions of Blame for an Accident

AU - Thorley, Craig

AU - Rushton-Woods, Jayne

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The present experiment examined whether attributions of blame for an incident can be shifted between individuals as a result of a leading eyewitness statement. Participants watched a video of an accident involving two men and then read either a non-leading eyewitness statement that blamed no one for the accident or a leading eyewitness statement that blamed one of the two men for the accident. Participants’ attributions of blame for the accident were then assessed either immediately or after a 1 week delay. Regardless of the time delay, just over one-third of participants who read a leading statement subsequently blamed the same person as the eyewitness. In contrast, less than 4% of participants who read a non-leading statement blamed one of the men. This research is the first to demonstrate blame conformity, where blame for an incident can be shifted between individuals as a result of a leading eyewitness statement.

AB - The present experiment examined whether attributions of blame for an incident can be shifted between individuals as a result of a leading eyewitness statement. Participants watched a video of an accident involving two men and then read either a non-leading eyewitness statement that blamed no one for the accident or a leading eyewitness statement that blamed one of the two men for the accident. Participants’ attributions of blame for the accident were then assessed either immediately or after a 1 week delay. Regardless of the time delay, just over one-third of participants who read a leading statement subsequently blamed the same person as the eyewitness. In contrast, less than 4% of participants who read a non-leading statement blamed one of the men. This research is the first to demonstrate blame conformity, where blame for an incident can be shifted between individuals as a result of a leading eyewitness statement.

U2 - 10.1002/acp.2906

DO - 10.1002/acp.2906

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 291

EP - 296

JO - Applied Cognitive Psychology

JF - Applied Cognitive Psychology

SN - 0888-4080

IS - 3

ER -