TY - JOUR
T1 - Big Data and what it means for evaluating integrated care programmes
AU - Kaehne, Axel
N1 - N/A
PY - 2019/6/20
Y1 - 2019/6/20
N2 - Purpose: Big Data is likely to have significant implications for the way in which services are planned, organised or delivered as well as the way in which we evaluate them. The increase in data availability creates particular challenges for evaluators in the field of integrated care and the purpose of this paper is to set out how we may usefully reframe these challenges in the longer term. Design/methodology/approach: Using the characteristics of Big Data as defined in the literature, the paper develops a narrative around the data and research design challenges and how they influence evaluation studies in the field of care integration. Findings: Big Data will have significant implications for how we conduct integrated care evaluations. In particular, dynamic modelling and study designs capable of accommodating new epistemic foundations for the phenomena of social organisations, such as emergence and feedback loops, are likely to be most helpful. Big Data also generates opportunities for exploratory data analysis approaches, as opposed to static model development and testing. Evaluators may find research designs useful that champion realist approaches or single-n designs. Originality/value: This paper reflects on the emerging literature and changing practice of data generation and data use in health care. It draws on organisational theory and outlines implications of Big Data for evaluating care integration initiatives.
AB - Purpose: Big Data is likely to have significant implications for the way in which services are planned, organised or delivered as well as the way in which we evaluate them. The increase in data availability creates particular challenges for evaluators in the field of integrated care and the purpose of this paper is to set out how we may usefully reframe these challenges in the longer term. Design/methodology/approach: Using the characteristics of Big Data as defined in the literature, the paper develops a narrative around the data and research design challenges and how they influence evaluation studies in the field of care integration. Findings: Big Data will have significant implications for how we conduct integrated care evaluations. In particular, dynamic modelling and study designs capable of accommodating new epistemic foundations for the phenomena of social organisations, such as emergence and feedback loops, are likely to be most helpful. Big Data also generates opportunities for exploratory data analysis approaches, as opposed to static model development and testing. Evaluators may find research designs useful that champion realist approaches or single-n designs. Originality/value: This paper reflects on the emerging literature and changing practice of data generation and data use in health care. It draws on organisational theory and outlines implications of Big Data for evaluating care integration initiatives.
KW - Big Data
KW - Evaluation
KW - Health care
KW - Integration
KW - Realist evaluation
KW - Single-n designs
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069767198&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069767198&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/JICA-05-2019-0017
DO - 10.1108/JICA-05-2019-0017
M3 - Article (journal)
AN - SCOPUS:85069767198
SN - 1476-9018
VL - 27
SP - 249
EP - 258
JO - Journal of Integrated Care
JF - Journal of Integrated Care
IS - 3
ER -