Bernard Shaw in contemporary Irish studies: "Passe and contemptible"?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Bernard Shaw’s works are most productively understood as artefacts of a sustained, unrivalled, public intellectual engagement with Ireland and the world. In this, Shaw anticipates precisely the kind of critical and creative range demanded in our own day, and his outputs and practices should be studied for the insights and dilemmas to which they draw attention. Shaw dealt with big questions, and returned constantly to them, refining his own position. This creates opportunities and problems for anyone reflecting on the significance of his works, and the structure of what follows reflects this. "Passé and contemptible" is organised around an attempt to sketch answers to three principal questions: How does Shaw sit in Irish Studies? In what ways is Ireland – the object of study – changing, and how does Irish Studies engage with or ignore these changes? In what ways might a new production of John Bull’s Other Island make the case for Shaw as a key presence in the field, and illuminate contemporary critical projects?
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)216-235
JournalShaw: The Annual of Bernard Shaw Studies
Volume30
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Bernard Shaw
Irish Studies
George Shaw
Ireland
Artifact
Bull
Public Intellectuals

Keywords

  • Ireland
  • Irish Studies
  • Critical Practice
  • Irish theatre
  • John Bull's Other Island
  • Modernity
  • Postcolonial Studies

Cite this

@article{610b8fb3841b4587ae22864d02723b15,
title = "Bernard Shaw in contemporary Irish studies: {"}Passe and contemptible{"}?",
abstract = "Bernard Shaw’s works are most productively understood as artefacts of a sustained, unrivalled, public intellectual engagement with Ireland and the world. In this, Shaw anticipates precisely the kind of critical and creative range demanded in our own day, and his outputs and practices should be studied for the insights and dilemmas to which they draw attention. Shaw dealt with big questions, and returned constantly to them, refining his own position. This creates opportunities and problems for anyone reflecting on the significance of his works, and the structure of what follows reflects this. {"}Pass{\'e} and contemptible{"} is organised around an attempt to sketch answers to three principal questions: How does Shaw sit in Irish Studies? In what ways is Ireland – the object of study – changing, and how does Irish Studies engage with or ignore these changes? In what ways might a new production of John Bull’s Other Island make the case for Shaw as a key presence in the field, and illuminate contemporary critical projects?",
keywords = "Ireland, Irish Studies, Critical Practice, Irish theatre, John Bull's Other Island, Modernity, Postcolonial Studies",
author = "Victor Merriman",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "216--235",
journal = "SHAW",
issn = "0741-5842",
publisher = "Penn State University Press",

}

Bernard Shaw in contemporary Irish studies: "Passe and contemptible"? / Merriman, Victor.

In: Shaw: The Annual of Bernard Shaw Studies, Vol. 30, 2010, p. 216-235.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bernard Shaw in contemporary Irish studies: "Passe and contemptible"?

AU - Merriman, Victor

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Bernard Shaw’s works are most productively understood as artefacts of a sustained, unrivalled, public intellectual engagement with Ireland and the world. In this, Shaw anticipates precisely the kind of critical and creative range demanded in our own day, and his outputs and practices should be studied for the insights and dilemmas to which they draw attention. Shaw dealt with big questions, and returned constantly to them, refining his own position. This creates opportunities and problems for anyone reflecting on the significance of his works, and the structure of what follows reflects this. "Passé and contemptible" is organised around an attempt to sketch answers to three principal questions: How does Shaw sit in Irish Studies? In what ways is Ireland – the object of study – changing, and how does Irish Studies engage with or ignore these changes? In what ways might a new production of John Bull’s Other Island make the case for Shaw as a key presence in the field, and illuminate contemporary critical projects?

AB - Bernard Shaw’s works are most productively understood as artefacts of a sustained, unrivalled, public intellectual engagement with Ireland and the world. In this, Shaw anticipates precisely the kind of critical and creative range demanded in our own day, and his outputs and practices should be studied for the insights and dilemmas to which they draw attention. Shaw dealt with big questions, and returned constantly to them, refining his own position. This creates opportunities and problems for anyone reflecting on the significance of his works, and the structure of what follows reflects this. "Passé and contemptible" is organised around an attempt to sketch answers to three principal questions: How does Shaw sit in Irish Studies? In what ways is Ireland – the object of study – changing, and how does Irish Studies engage with or ignore these changes? In what ways might a new production of John Bull’s Other Island make the case for Shaw as a key presence in the field, and illuminate contemporary critical projects?

KW - Ireland

KW - Irish Studies

KW - Critical Practice

KW - Irish theatre

KW - John Bull's Other Island

KW - Modernity

KW - Postcolonial Studies

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 216

EP - 235

JO - SHAW

JF - SHAW

SN - 0741-5842

ER -