Automaticity without extensive training: The role of memory retrieval in implementation of task-defined rules

Motonori Yamaguchi, Robert W. Proctor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although the concept of automaticity is closely associated with extensive rote training, previous studies have shown that task-defined stimulus–response (S–R) mappings can be implemented in parallel and involuntarily, without much training, as if they are automatically processed. An irrelevant task context may trigger a task-defined rule because the rule is actively maintained in working memory, resulting in erroneous implementation of that rule. However, the present study demonstrated that active maintenance of task rules is not necessary for their automatic implementation. Instead, the results are consistent with the memory view of automaticity, according to which task-defined S–R rules are implemented via automatic retrieval of S–R episodes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)347-354
JournalPsychonomic Bulletin & Review
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Automaticity without extensive training: The role of memory retrieval in implementation of task-defined rules'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this