Abstract
Previous evidence on neurotypical adults shows that the presentation of a stimulus allocates the attention to its modality, resulting in faster responses to a subsequent target presented in the same (vs. different) modality. People with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASDs) often fail to detect a (visual or auditory) target in a stream of stimuli after shifting attention between modalities, possibly because they do not fully switch their attention from one modality to the other. In this study, the performance of a group of high-functioning patients with ASDs and a group of neurotypical controls was compared. Participants were asked to detect a target, auditory or visual, which was preceded, at different temporal intervals (i.e., 150, 600, 1000 ms), by an uninformative cue, either in the same or a different modality. In controls, when the target was visual, the cue modality did not affect performance. Unlike, when the target was auditory, a visual cue produced longer reaction times as compared to when it was auditory. In the ASD group, irrespectively of the modality of the cue, a slowing-down of responses to the target was observed at increasing temporal intervals. The discrepancy of performance is consistent with the 'over-focused' theory of sensory processing.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 517-525 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2013 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Attention
- Auditory
- Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASDs)
- Multisensory
- Shifting
- Visual
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Attentional shifts between audition and vision in Autism Spectrum Disorders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver