Assessment Analytics Using Turnitin & Grademark in an Undergraduate Medical Curriculum

Peter Reed, Simon Watmough, Paul Duvall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (journal)peer-review

76 Downloads (Pure)


In recent times there has been an increased interest around assessment feedback – evaluation of the University of Liverpool (UoL) Medical Curriculum has shown students have real concerns about the feedback they receive (Reed & Watmough, 2015; Watmough & O’Sullivan, 2011). These concerns have been amplified in recent years by results from the National Student Survey (NSS). Through the implementation of the Turnitin and Grademark systems to support the Electronic Management of Assessment (EMA), this study set out to research the suitability of the systems as well as investigate the potential of assessment analytics – the concept that assessment data can be viewed to inform future practice and provide a coherent and holistic view of staff and student performance. Quantitative and qualitative data show that academic staff are positive in relation to the implementation of said systems to support the assessment and feedback cycle, and that whilst the collection and analysis of data can be useful, it is not a complete panacea. There are ethical considerations involved in relation to staff and students in the collection and analysis of such data.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)92-108
JournalJournal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice
Issue number2
Early online date3 Jun 2015
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 Jun 2015


Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment Analytics Using Turnitin & Grademark in an Undergraduate Medical Curriculum'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this