Assessment Analytics Using Turnitin & Grademark in an Undergraduate Medical Curriculum

Peter Reed, Simon Watmough, Paul Duvall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In recent times there has been an increased interest around assessment feedback – evaluation of the University of Liverpool (UoL) Medical Curriculum has shown students have real concerns about the feedback they receive (Reed & Watmough, 2015; Watmough & O’Sullivan, 2011). These concerns have been amplified in recent years by results from the National Student Survey (NSS). Through the implementation of the Turnitin and Grademark systems to support the Electronic Management of Assessment (EMA), this study set out to research the suitability of the systems as well as investigate the potential of assessment analytics – the concept that assessment data can be viewed to inform future practice and provide a coherent and holistic view of staff and student performance. Quantitative and qualitative data show that academic staff are positive in relation to the implementation of said systems to support the assessment and feedback cycle, and that whilst the collection and analysis of data can be useful, it is not a complete panacea. There are ethical considerations involved in relation to staff and students in the collection and analysis of such data.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)92-108
JournalJournal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice
Volume3
Issue number2
Early online date3 Jun 2015
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 Jun 2015

Fingerprint

staff
student
electronics
curriculum
evaluation
management
time

Cite this

@article{f2aa0cff7c864df9bb3b7b5877da3900,
title = "Assessment Analytics Using Turnitin & Grademark in an Undergraduate Medical Curriculum",
abstract = "In recent times there has been an increased interest around assessment feedback – evaluation of the University of Liverpool (UoL) Medical Curriculum has shown students have real concerns about the feedback they receive (Reed & Watmough, 2015; Watmough & O’Sullivan, 2011). These concerns have been amplified in recent years by results from the National Student Survey (NSS). Through the implementation of the Turnitin and Grademark systems to support the Electronic Management of Assessment (EMA), this study set out to research the suitability of the systems as well as investigate the potential of assessment analytics – the concept that assessment data can be viewed to inform future practice and provide a coherent and holistic view of staff and student performance. Quantitative and qualitative data show that academic staff are positive in relation to the implementation of said systems to support the assessment and feedback cycle, and that whilst the collection and analysis of data can be useful, it is not a complete panacea. There are ethical considerations involved in relation to staff and students in the collection and analysis of such data.",
author = "Peter Reed and Simon Watmough and Paul Duvall",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "3",
doi = "10.14297/jpaap.v3i2.159",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "92--108",
journal = "Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice",
issn = "2051-9788",
number = "2",

}

Assessment Analytics Using Turnitin & Grademark in an Undergraduate Medical Curriculum. / Reed, Peter; Watmough, Simon; Duvall, Paul.

In: Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, Vol. 3, No. 2, 03.06.2015, p. 92-108.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment Analytics Using Turnitin & Grademark in an Undergraduate Medical Curriculum

AU - Reed, Peter

AU - Watmough, Simon

AU - Duvall, Paul

PY - 2015/6/3

Y1 - 2015/6/3

N2 - In recent times there has been an increased interest around assessment feedback – evaluation of the University of Liverpool (UoL) Medical Curriculum has shown students have real concerns about the feedback they receive (Reed & Watmough, 2015; Watmough & O’Sullivan, 2011). These concerns have been amplified in recent years by results from the National Student Survey (NSS). Through the implementation of the Turnitin and Grademark systems to support the Electronic Management of Assessment (EMA), this study set out to research the suitability of the systems as well as investigate the potential of assessment analytics – the concept that assessment data can be viewed to inform future practice and provide a coherent and holistic view of staff and student performance. Quantitative and qualitative data show that academic staff are positive in relation to the implementation of said systems to support the assessment and feedback cycle, and that whilst the collection and analysis of data can be useful, it is not a complete panacea. There are ethical considerations involved in relation to staff and students in the collection and analysis of such data.

AB - In recent times there has been an increased interest around assessment feedback – evaluation of the University of Liverpool (UoL) Medical Curriculum has shown students have real concerns about the feedback they receive (Reed & Watmough, 2015; Watmough & O’Sullivan, 2011). These concerns have been amplified in recent years by results from the National Student Survey (NSS). Through the implementation of the Turnitin and Grademark systems to support the Electronic Management of Assessment (EMA), this study set out to research the suitability of the systems as well as investigate the potential of assessment analytics – the concept that assessment data can be viewed to inform future practice and provide a coherent and holistic view of staff and student performance. Quantitative and qualitative data show that academic staff are positive in relation to the implementation of said systems to support the assessment and feedback cycle, and that whilst the collection and analysis of data can be useful, it is not a complete panacea. There are ethical considerations involved in relation to staff and students in the collection and analysis of such data.

UR - http://jpaap.napier.ac.uk/index.php/JPAAP/article/view/159

U2 - 10.14297/jpaap.v3i2.159

DO - 10.14297/jpaap.v3i2.159

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 92

EP - 108

JO - Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice

JF - Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice

SN - 2051-9788

IS - 2

ER -