Article 5 of Regulation 1/2003: the limits to national procedural autonomy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Examines the European Court of Justice decision in Prezes Urzedu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentow v Tele2 Polska sp z oo (now Netia SA) (C-375/09) on whether, in a case concerning the parallel application of national and EU competition law, a national competition authority was competent to declare definitively that a practice did not infringe the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union art.102, as per national law, or merely to declare that there were no grounds for action under that provision, as per Regulation 1/2003 art.5.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)564-572
JournalEuropean Competition Law Review
Volume32
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

autonomy
regulation
European Court of Justice
Law
treaty
EU

Cite this

@article{110010e9ed704824a2ec7bb377083150,
title = "Article 5 of Regulation 1/2003: the limits to national procedural autonomy",
abstract = "Examines the European Court of Justice decision in Prezes Urzedu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentow v Tele2 Polska sp z oo (now Netia SA) (C-375/09) on whether, in a case concerning the parallel application of national and EU competition law, a national competition authority was competent to declare definitively that a practice did not infringe the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union art.102, as per national law, or merely to declare that there were no grounds for action under that provision, as per Regulation 1/2003 art.5.",
author = "Franco Rizzuto",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "564--572",
journal = "European Competition Law Review",
issn = "0144-3054",
publisher = "Sweet & Maxwell",
number = "11",

}

Article 5 of Regulation 1/2003: the limits to national procedural autonomy. / Rizzuto, Franco.

In: European Competition Law Review, Vol. 32, No. 11, 2011, p. 564-572.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Article 5 of Regulation 1/2003: the limits to national procedural autonomy

AU - Rizzuto, Franco

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Examines the European Court of Justice decision in Prezes Urzedu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentow v Tele2 Polska sp z oo (now Netia SA) (C-375/09) on whether, in a case concerning the parallel application of national and EU competition law, a national competition authority was competent to declare definitively that a practice did not infringe the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union art.102, as per national law, or merely to declare that there were no grounds for action under that provision, as per Regulation 1/2003 art.5.

AB - Examines the European Court of Justice decision in Prezes Urzedu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentow v Tele2 Polska sp z oo (now Netia SA) (C-375/09) on whether, in a case concerning the parallel application of national and EU competition law, a national competition authority was competent to declare definitively that a practice did not infringe the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union art.102, as per national law, or merely to declare that there were no grounds for action under that provision, as per Regulation 1/2003 art.5.

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 564

EP - 572

JO - European Competition Law Review

JF - European Competition Law Review

SN - 0144-3054

IS - 11

ER -