Are object affordances fully automatic? A case of covert attention

Stergios Makris, Aviad Hadar, Kielan Yarrow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)
8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Inspired in part by Gibson’s (1979) ecological approach to perception, current neurocognitive theories of action suggest that the simple viewing of an object can automatically elicit motor programs for specific acts. However, the degree to which such affordances should be considered truly automatic is unknown. Here we explored the generation of motor plans afforded by pairs of cue objects that were viewed peripherally under different attentional states. Participants focused centrally while attending to just one of two peripheral cue objects that together had a strong significance for pinching, grasping, or both. They were instructed to ignore the objects and instead give power or precision grip responses to subsequent changes in background color. The data showed a significant interaction between type of response and type of object, indicating that object affordances are perceived even in nonfoveal vision. Critically, the generation of affordances was modulated by the locus of attention: Motor preparation was biased toward the attended object when two different categories of object appeared in the same trial, but the generation of affordances was also influenced by unattended stimuli. This finding demonstrates that object-action priming is not completely automatic, instead being constrained by processes of perceptual selection.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)797-802
JournalBehavioral Neuroscience
Volume127
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2013

Fingerprint

Cues
Hand Strength
Color
Power (Psychology)

Cite this

Makris, Stergios ; Hadar, Aviad ; Yarrow, Kielan. / Are object affordances fully automatic? A case of covert attention. In: Behavioral Neuroscience. 2013 ; Vol. 127, No. 5. pp. 797-802.
@article{5b713087f8eb41029759571c0946cbc0,
title = "Are object affordances fully automatic? A case of covert attention",
abstract = "Inspired in part by Gibson’s (1979) ecological approach to perception, current neurocognitive theories of action suggest that the simple viewing of an object can automatically elicit motor programs for specific acts. However, the degree to which such affordances should be considered truly automatic is unknown. Here we explored the generation of motor plans afforded by pairs of cue objects that were viewed peripherally under different attentional states. Participants focused centrally while attending to just one of two peripheral cue objects that together had a strong significance for pinching, grasping, or both. They were instructed to ignore the objects and instead give power or precision grip responses to subsequent changes in background color. The data showed a significant interaction between type of response and type of object, indicating that object affordances are perceived even in nonfoveal vision. Critically, the generation of affordances was modulated by the locus of attention: Motor preparation was biased toward the attended object when two different categories of object appeared in the same trial, but the generation of affordances was also influenced by unattended stimuli. This finding demonstrates that object-action priming is not completely automatic, instead being constrained by processes of perceptual selection.",
author = "Stergios Makris and Aviad Hadar and Kielan Yarrow",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1037/a0033946",
language = "English",
volume = "127",
pages = "797--802",
journal = "Behavioral Neuroscience",
issn = "0735-7044",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "5",

}

Are object affordances fully automatic? A case of covert attention. / Makris, Stergios; Hadar, Aviad; Yarrow, Kielan.

In: Behavioral Neuroscience, Vol. 127, No. 5, 10.2013, p. 797-802.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are object affordances fully automatic? A case of covert attention

AU - Makris, Stergios

AU - Hadar, Aviad

AU - Yarrow, Kielan

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - Inspired in part by Gibson’s (1979) ecological approach to perception, current neurocognitive theories of action suggest that the simple viewing of an object can automatically elicit motor programs for specific acts. However, the degree to which such affordances should be considered truly automatic is unknown. Here we explored the generation of motor plans afforded by pairs of cue objects that were viewed peripherally under different attentional states. Participants focused centrally while attending to just one of two peripheral cue objects that together had a strong significance for pinching, grasping, or both. They were instructed to ignore the objects and instead give power or precision grip responses to subsequent changes in background color. The data showed a significant interaction between type of response and type of object, indicating that object affordances are perceived even in nonfoveal vision. Critically, the generation of affordances was modulated by the locus of attention: Motor preparation was biased toward the attended object when two different categories of object appeared in the same trial, but the generation of affordances was also influenced by unattended stimuli. This finding demonstrates that object-action priming is not completely automatic, instead being constrained by processes of perceptual selection.

AB - Inspired in part by Gibson’s (1979) ecological approach to perception, current neurocognitive theories of action suggest that the simple viewing of an object can automatically elicit motor programs for specific acts. However, the degree to which such affordances should be considered truly automatic is unknown. Here we explored the generation of motor plans afforded by pairs of cue objects that were viewed peripherally under different attentional states. Participants focused centrally while attending to just one of two peripheral cue objects that together had a strong significance for pinching, grasping, or both. They were instructed to ignore the objects and instead give power or precision grip responses to subsequent changes in background color. The data showed a significant interaction between type of response and type of object, indicating that object affordances are perceived even in nonfoveal vision. Critically, the generation of affordances was modulated by the locus of attention: Motor preparation was biased toward the attended object when two different categories of object appeared in the same trial, but the generation of affordances was also influenced by unattended stimuli. This finding demonstrates that object-action priming is not completely automatic, instead being constrained by processes of perceptual selection.

U2 - 10.1037/a0033946

DO - 10.1037/a0033946

M3 - Article

VL - 127

SP - 797

EP - 802

JO - Behavioral Neuroscience

JF - Behavioral Neuroscience

SN - 0735-7044

IS - 5

ER -