Anti-social behaviour in British cities

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In Britain, we have been told by politicians that anti-social behaviour (ASB) is a menace that has to be tackled. In this review article, evidence is provided that ASB is not a problem that affects us all; rather, concerns are highest within urban areas, particularly in certain deprived neighbourhoods and town and city centres. Possible explanations for this spatial concentration of concern are explored, for instance, relating to the effectiveness of informal social control mechanisms and people's differing behavioural expectations for public spaces. It is contended that some activity may be misidentified as ASB because it does not fit the cultural and social norms of the majority. It is also argued that aesthetics plays a part in determining behavioural acceptability and that, particularly in urban centres, spaces can be cleansed of difference to cater for the tastes of a ‘consuming majority’.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1681-1696
JournalGeography Compass
Volume2
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

antisocial behavior
social behavior
public space
Social Norms
social control
city center
esthetics
politician
aesthetics
urban area
town
evidence
city

Cite this

Millie, Andrew. / Anti-social behaviour in British cities. In: Geography Compass. 2008 ; Vol. 2, No. 5. pp. 1681-1696.
@article{8c951637cfc84bc4b4f2835a5dcb8da3,
title = "Anti-social behaviour in British cities",
abstract = "In Britain, we have been told by politicians that anti-social behaviour (ASB) is a menace that has to be tackled. In this review article, evidence is provided that ASB is not a problem that affects us all; rather, concerns are highest within urban areas, particularly in certain deprived neighbourhoods and town and city centres. Possible explanations for this spatial concentration of concern are explored, for instance, relating to the effectiveness of informal social control mechanisms and people's differing behavioural expectations for public spaces. It is contended that some activity may be misidentified as ASB because it does not fit the cultural and social norms of the majority. It is also argued that aesthetics plays a part in determining behavioural acceptability and that, particularly in urban centres, spaces can be cleansed of difference to cater for the tastes of a ‘consuming majority’.",
author = "Andrew Millie",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00135.x",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "1681--1696",
journal = "Geography Compass",
issn = "1749-8198",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "5",

}

Anti-social behaviour in British cities. / Millie, Andrew.

In: Geography Compass, Vol. 2, No. 5, 2008, p. 1681-1696.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anti-social behaviour in British cities

AU - Millie, Andrew

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - In Britain, we have been told by politicians that anti-social behaviour (ASB) is a menace that has to be tackled. In this review article, evidence is provided that ASB is not a problem that affects us all; rather, concerns are highest within urban areas, particularly in certain deprived neighbourhoods and town and city centres. Possible explanations for this spatial concentration of concern are explored, for instance, relating to the effectiveness of informal social control mechanisms and people's differing behavioural expectations for public spaces. It is contended that some activity may be misidentified as ASB because it does not fit the cultural and social norms of the majority. It is also argued that aesthetics plays a part in determining behavioural acceptability and that, particularly in urban centres, spaces can be cleansed of difference to cater for the tastes of a ‘consuming majority’.

AB - In Britain, we have been told by politicians that anti-social behaviour (ASB) is a menace that has to be tackled. In this review article, evidence is provided that ASB is not a problem that affects us all; rather, concerns are highest within urban areas, particularly in certain deprived neighbourhoods and town and city centres. Possible explanations for this spatial concentration of concern are explored, for instance, relating to the effectiveness of informal social control mechanisms and people's differing behavioural expectations for public spaces. It is contended that some activity may be misidentified as ASB because it does not fit the cultural and social norms of the majority. It is also argued that aesthetics plays a part in determining behavioural acceptability and that, particularly in urban centres, spaces can be cleansed of difference to cater for the tastes of a ‘consuming majority’.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00135.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00135.x

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 1681

EP - 1696

JO - Geography Compass

JF - Geography Compass

SN - 1749-8198

IS - 5

ER -