Animal Faux Pas: Two Legs Good Four Legs Bad for Theory of Mind, but Not in the Broad Autism Spectrum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

AbstractResearch shows that the general population varies with regard to both autistic traits and theory of mind (ToM) ability. Other work has shown that autistic individuals may not underperform on ToM tests when the agent of evaluation is anthropomorphic rather than typically human. Two studies examined the relation between ToM and autistic trait profiles in over 650 adults using either the standard Faux Pas Recognition Test (FPT) or an anthropomorphized version of the FPT (FPTa). Results showed that autistic trait profiles were related to faux pas detection ability in the FPT but not the FPTa. Furthermore, while those with the broad autism phenotype scored significantly worse than those who were typically developed on the FPT, scores did not significantly differ on the FPTa. These findings add to a growing body of work suggesting that ToM ability is not at a global deficit in those on the autistic spectrum, but may relate to the mindreading of specifically human agents.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)81-95
JournalThe Journal of Genetic Psychology
Volume180
Issue number2-3
Early online date16 May 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 16 May 2019

Fingerprint

Theory of Mind
Autistic Disorder
Aptitude
Leg
Phenotype
Recognition (Psychology)
Population

Keywords

  • Broad autism phenotype
  • anthropomorphism
  • autism
  • faux pas
  • perspective taking
  • theory of mind

Cite this

@article{68dc711209b04bcc8bd118a9439cf08e,
title = "Animal Faux Pas: Two Legs Good Four Legs Bad for Theory of Mind, but Not in the Broad Autism Spectrum",
abstract = "AbstractResearch shows that the general population varies with regard to both autistic traits and theory of mind (ToM) ability. Other work has shown that autistic individuals may not underperform on ToM tests when the agent of evaluation is anthropomorphic rather than typically human. Two studies examined the relation between ToM and autistic trait profiles in over 650 adults using either the standard Faux Pas Recognition Test (FPT) or an anthropomorphized version of the FPT (FPTa). Results showed that autistic trait profiles were related to faux pas detection ability in the FPT but not the FPTa. Furthermore, while those with the broad autism phenotype scored significantly worse than those who were typically developed on the FPT, scores did not significantly differ on the FPTa. These findings add to a growing body of work suggesting that ToM ability is not at a global deficit in those on the autistic spectrum, but may relate to the mindreading of specifically human agents.",
keywords = "Broad autism phenotype, anthropomorphism, autism, faux pas, perspective taking, theory of mind",
author = "Gray Atherton and Liam Cross",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1080/00221325.2019.1593100",
language = "English",
volume = "180",
pages = "81--95",
journal = "Journal of Genetic Psychology",
issn = "0022-1325",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Animal Faux Pas: Two Legs Good Four Legs Bad for Theory of Mind, but Not in the Broad Autism Spectrum

AU - Atherton, Gray

AU - Cross, Liam

PY - 2019/5/16

Y1 - 2019/5/16

N2 - AbstractResearch shows that the general population varies with regard to both autistic traits and theory of mind (ToM) ability. Other work has shown that autistic individuals may not underperform on ToM tests when the agent of evaluation is anthropomorphic rather than typically human. Two studies examined the relation between ToM and autistic trait profiles in over 650 adults using either the standard Faux Pas Recognition Test (FPT) or an anthropomorphized version of the FPT (FPTa). Results showed that autistic trait profiles were related to faux pas detection ability in the FPT but not the FPTa. Furthermore, while those with the broad autism phenotype scored significantly worse than those who were typically developed on the FPT, scores did not significantly differ on the FPTa. These findings add to a growing body of work suggesting that ToM ability is not at a global deficit in those on the autistic spectrum, but may relate to the mindreading of specifically human agents.

AB - AbstractResearch shows that the general population varies with regard to both autistic traits and theory of mind (ToM) ability. Other work has shown that autistic individuals may not underperform on ToM tests when the agent of evaluation is anthropomorphic rather than typically human. Two studies examined the relation between ToM and autistic trait profiles in over 650 adults using either the standard Faux Pas Recognition Test (FPT) or an anthropomorphized version of the FPT (FPTa). Results showed that autistic trait profiles were related to faux pas detection ability in the FPT but not the FPTa. Furthermore, while those with the broad autism phenotype scored significantly worse than those who were typically developed on the FPT, scores did not significantly differ on the FPTa. These findings add to a growing body of work suggesting that ToM ability is not at a global deficit in those on the autistic spectrum, but may relate to the mindreading of specifically human agents.

KW - Broad autism phenotype

KW - anthropomorphism

KW - autism

KW - faux pas

KW - perspective taking

KW - theory of mind

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/animal-faux-pas-two-legs-good-four-legs-bad-theory-mind-not-broad-autism-spectrum

U2 - 10.1080/00221325.2019.1593100

DO - 10.1080/00221325.2019.1593100

M3 - Article

VL - 180

SP - 81

EP - 95

JO - Journal of Genetic Psychology

JF - Journal of Genetic Psychology

SN - 0022-1325

IS - 2-3

ER -