Anatomic versus reverse total shoulder replacement for patients with osteoarthritis and intact rotator cuff: the RAPSODI-UK randomised controlled trial protocol

  • Hannah L Rodrick*
  • , Joseph Dias
  • , Adam C Watts
  • , Michael J Walton
  • , Stephen Brealey
  • , Richard Page
  • , Nadine E Foster
  • , Katy Boland
  • , Lindsay J Cunningham
  • , Caroline Fairhurst
  • , John Geoghegan
  • , William Greenwood
  • , Catherine Hewitt
  • , Cliona Kirwan
  • , Heather Leggett
  • , Catriona McDaid
  • , Matthew Parkes
  • , Steve Parrott
  • , Rachael Powell
  • , Jonathan G Quicke
  • Gareth Roberts, Fiona Rose, Harvinder Pal Singh, Helen Spickett, Chris J Sutton, Fraser Wiggins, Qi Wu, Ian Trail
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (journal)peer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Shoulder osteoarthritis most commonly affects older adults, causing pain, reduced function and quality of life. Total shoulder replacements (TSRs) are indicated once other non-surgical options no longer provide adequate pain relief. Two main types of TSRs are widely used: anatomic TSR (aTSR) and reverse TSR (rTSR). It is not clear whether one TSR type provides better short- or long-term outcomes for patients, and which, if either, is more cost-effective for the National Health Service (NHS). Methods and analysis: RAPSODI-UK is a multi-centre, pragmatic, two-parallel arm, superiority randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of aTSR versus rTSR for adults aged 60+ with a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis, an intact rotator cuff and bone stock suitable for TSR. Participants in both arms of the trial will receive usual post-operative rehabilitation. We aim to recruit 430 participants from approximately 28 NHS sites across the UK. The primary outcome is the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) at 2 years post-randomisation. Outcomes will be collected at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include the pain and function subscales of the SPADI, the Oxford Shoulder Score, health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), complications, range of movement and strength, revisions and mortality. The between-group difference in the primary outcome will be derived from a constrained longitudinal data analysis model. We will also undertake a full health economic evaluation and conduct qualitative interviews to explore perceptions of acceptability of the two types of TSR and experiences of recovery with a sample of participants. Ethics and dissemination: Ethics committee approval for this trial was obtained (London - Queen Square Research Ethics Committee, Rec Reference 22/LO/0617) on 4 October 2022. The results of the main trial will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and using other professional and media outlets. Trial registration number: ISRCTN12216466.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalBMJ Open
Volume15
Issue number12
Early online date11 Dec 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Dec 2025

Keywords

  • Pragmatic Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Shoulder
  • Orthopaedic & trauma surgery
  • Orthopedics
  • Shoulder Joint/surgery
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Male
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United Kingdom
  • Rotator Cuff/surgery
  • Multicenter Studies as Topic
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder/methods
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Quality of Life
  • Female
  • Osteoarthritis/surgery
  • Aged
  • Equivalence Trials as Topic

Research Groups

  • Musculoskeletal Research Group

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anatomic versus reverse total shoulder replacement for patients with osteoarthritis and intact rotator cuff: the RAPSODI-UK randomised controlled trial protocol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this