An investigation of the practice activities and coaching behaviours of professional top-level youth soccer coaches

Mark Partington, C Cushion

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the coaching behaviours of elite English youth soccer coaches in different practice settings and gain insight into the coaches’ cognitive processes underpinning these behaviours. The practice setting was split into two types of activities, ‘training form’ and ‘playing form’, and behavioural data were collected using a modified version of the Coaching Analysis and Intervention System (CAIS). Interpretive interview data were triangulated with the behavioural data to ensure that both the ‘what’ and the ‘why’ of the coaches’ behaviour and practice were considered. The results showed the coaches using more ‘training form’ activities than ‘playing form’, and using high levels of prescriptive instruction, regardless of practice type, in contrast to a stated desire to ‘developing the whole player’, creating ‘decision makers’ and being a ‘facilitator of knowledge creation’. The interviews revealed that the coaches had a low self-awareness about their behaviour with an epistemological gap identified between understanding and practice, with statements of intent not being matched by knowledge and action.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)374-382
JournalScandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Sep 2011

Fingerprint

soccer
coaching
coach
self awareness
interview
decision maker
elite
instruction

Keywords

  • Coaching behaviour
  • systematic observation
  • practice type
  • soccer
  • youth.

Cite this

@article{4d7c01a09993468eba37934e985dd8c0,
title = "An investigation of the practice activities and coaching behaviours of professional top-level youth soccer coaches",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to investigate the coaching behaviours of elite English youth soccer coaches in different practice settings and gain insight into the coaches’ cognitive processes underpinning these behaviours. The practice setting was split into two types of activities, ‘training form’ and ‘playing form’, and behavioural data were collected using a modified version of the Coaching Analysis and Intervention System (CAIS). Interpretive interview data were triangulated with the behavioural data to ensure that both the ‘what’ and the ‘why’ of the coaches’ behaviour and practice were considered. The results showed the coaches using more ‘training form’ activities than ‘playing form’, and using high levels of prescriptive instruction, regardless of practice type, in contrast to a stated desire to ‘developing the whole player’, creating ‘decision makers’ and being a ‘facilitator of knowledge creation’. The interviews revealed that the coaches had a low self-awareness about their behaviour with an epistemological gap identified between understanding and practice, with statements of intent not being matched by knowledge and action.",
keywords = "Coaching behaviour, systematic observation, practice type, soccer, youth.",
author = "Mark Partington and C Cushion",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01383.x",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "374--382",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports",
issn = "0905-7188",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An investigation of the practice activities and coaching behaviours of professional top-level youth soccer coaches

AU - Partington, Mark

AU - Cushion, C

PY - 2011/9/13

Y1 - 2011/9/13

N2 - The aim of this study was to investigate the coaching behaviours of elite English youth soccer coaches in different practice settings and gain insight into the coaches’ cognitive processes underpinning these behaviours. The practice setting was split into two types of activities, ‘training form’ and ‘playing form’, and behavioural data were collected using a modified version of the Coaching Analysis and Intervention System (CAIS). Interpretive interview data were triangulated with the behavioural data to ensure that both the ‘what’ and the ‘why’ of the coaches’ behaviour and practice were considered. The results showed the coaches using more ‘training form’ activities than ‘playing form’, and using high levels of prescriptive instruction, regardless of practice type, in contrast to a stated desire to ‘developing the whole player’, creating ‘decision makers’ and being a ‘facilitator of knowledge creation’. The interviews revealed that the coaches had a low self-awareness about their behaviour with an epistemological gap identified between understanding and practice, with statements of intent not being matched by knowledge and action.

AB - The aim of this study was to investigate the coaching behaviours of elite English youth soccer coaches in different practice settings and gain insight into the coaches’ cognitive processes underpinning these behaviours. The practice setting was split into two types of activities, ‘training form’ and ‘playing form’, and behavioural data were collected using a modified version of the Coaching Analysis and Intervention System (CAIS). Interpretive interview data were triangulated with the behavioural data to ensure that both the ‘what’ and the ‘why’ of the coaches’ behaviour and practice were considered. The results showed the coaches using more ‘training form’ activities than ‘playing form’, and using high levels of prescriptive instruction, regardless of practice type, in contrast to a stated desire to ‘developing the whole player’, creating ‘decision makers’ and being a ‘facilitator of knowledge creation’. The interviews revealed that the coaches had a low self-awareness about their behaviour with an epistemological gap identified between understanding and practice, with statements of intent not being matched by knowledge and action.

KW - Coaching behaviour

KW - systematic observation

KW - practice type

KW - soccer

KW - youth.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01383.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01383.x

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 374

EP - 382

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports

SN - 0905-7188

IS - 3

ER -