An Evaluation Of The Annual Review Process For Specialist Registrars In The Mersey Deanery

J. Bache, J. Brown, D. Graham

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

    Abstract

    Annual review of Specialist Registrars, and production of a record on in-training assessment, is a mandatory component of training. Mersey Deanery has established a system of review that incorporates a wider evaluation of the trainee's needs and future requirements. The aim of the study was to ascertain whether the review process was perceived by trainees and trainers to be beneficial, and identify areas of potential improvement. 1093 questionnaires, inviting answers on ten point scales, were distributed between September 2000 to September 2001. 914 (83.6%) questionnaires were returned, 605 (66.2%) from trainees and 309 (33.8%) from trainers. The process was thought to be of benefit (trainees mean score = 8.29, trainers mean score =8.63). Trainees particularly appreciated advice on careers (511 free text responses), future training (122) and research (37). The review process was of benefit to both trainees and trainers.
    Original languageEnglish
    Publication statusPublished - 2002
    EventAssociation for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) Conference - Lisbon, Portugal
    Duration: 29 Aug 20021 Sept 2002

    Conference

    ConferenceAssociation for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) Conference
    Country/TerritoryPortugal
    CityLisbon
    Period29/08/021/09/02

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'An Evaluation Of The Annual Review Process For Specialist Registrars In The Mersey Deanery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this