Accountability and professionalism: A contradiction in terms?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Declining trust in public services has led to increasing calls for higher education to be 'accountable' for the quality of its teaching and learning provision. However, increasing levels of quality evaluation have led academics to feel that their professionalism is under attack. Reflecting on this history and various dimensions of accountability, this paper seeks to interpret accountability by addressing two questions: What is accountability in higher education? How can it be related to academic professionalism? The paper argues that professionalism and accountability appear to be contradictory terms, but can exist simultaneously. If academics' moral and social responsibility becomes requisite to an enhanced social accounting for the quality of university teaching and learning, there could be less perceived tension between academic professionalism and accountability.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)785-795
Number of pages11
JournalHigher Education Research and Development
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2012

Fingerprint

responsibility
university teaching
social responsibility
learning
public service
education
professionalism
Teaching
history
evaluation

Keywords

  • accountability
  • distrust
  • higher education
  • professionalism
  • quality evaluation
  • responsibility

Cite this

@article{4bcfcaa6ab1d4fd38da7a2f97bea7f4f,
title = "Accountability and professionalism: A contradiction in terms?",
abstract = "Declining trust in public services has led to increasing calls for higher education to be 'accountable' for the quality of its teaching and learning provision. However, increasing levels of quality evaluation have led academics to feel that their professionalism is under attack. Reflecting on this history and various dimensions of accountability, this paper seeks to interpret accountability by addressing two questions: What is accountability in higher education? How can it be related to academic professionalism? The paper argues that professionalism and accountability appear to be contradictory terms, but can exist simultaneously. If academics' moral and social responsibility becomes requisite to an enhanced social accounting for the quality of university teaching and learning, there could be less perceived tension between academic professionalism and accountability.",
keywords = "accountability, distrust, higher education, professionalism, quality evaluation, responsibility",
author = "Ming Cheng",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/07294360.2011.653960",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "785--795",
journal = "Higher Education Research and Development",
issn = "0729-4360",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "6",

}

Accountability and professionalism : A contradiction in terms? / Cheng, Ming.

In: Higher Education Research and Development, Vol. 31, No. 6, 01.12.2012, p. 785-795.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accountability and professionalism

T2 - A contradiction in terms?

AU - Cheng, Ming

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - Declining trust in public services has led to increasing calls for higher education to be 'accountable' for the quality of its teaching and learning provision. However, increasing levels of quality evaluation have led academics to feel that their professionalism is under attack. Reflecting on this history and various dimensions of accountability, this paper seeks to interpret accountability by addressing two questions: What is accountability in higher education? How can it be related to academic professionalism? The paper argues that professionalism and accountability appear to be contradictory terms, but can exist simultaneously. If academics' moral and social responsibility becomes requisite to an enhanced social accounting for the quality of university teaching and learning, there could be less perceived tension between academic professionalism and accountability.

AB - Declining trust in public services has led to increasing calls for higher education to be 'accountable' for the quality of its teaching and learning provision. However, increasing levels of quality evaluation have led academics to feel that their professionalism is under attack. Reflecting on this history and various dimensions of accountability, this paper seeks to interpret accountability by addressing two questions: What is accountability in higher education? How can it be related to academic professionalism? The paper argues that professionalism and accountability appear to be contradictory terms, but can exist simultaneously. If academics' moral and social responsibility becomes requisite to an enhanced social accounting for the quality of university teaching and learning, there could be less perceived tension between academic professionalism and accountability.

KW - accountability

KW - distrust

KW - higher education

KW - professionalism

KW - quality evaluation

KW - responsibility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870921449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870921449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07294360.2011.653960

DO - 10.1080/07294360.2011.653960

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84870921449

VL - 31

SP - 785

EP - 795

JO - Higher Education Research and Development

JF - Higher Education Research and Development

SN - 0729-4360

IS - 6

ER -