Absent but present: a critical analysis of the representation of sexuality in recent youth policy in the UK

Allison Moore, Phil Prescott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Current youth policy in England and Wales utilises ‘transition’ as the major framework for understanding young people's movement from ‘youth’ to ‘adulthood’. Underpinning this are developmental assumptions about who young people are and who they ‘should’ become, especially with regard to sexuality. ‘Childhood’ and ‘youth’ are conceptualised as asexual or pre-sexual categories and those young people who are deemed to have sexual knowledge are problematised. Transitions to adulthood are inescapably heteronormative: the movement to adulthood is not simply about becoming an adult, but about becoming a man or a woman conforming to compulsory heterosexuality. Current youth policy says little about young people's sexuality and when it does it frequently conflates sexual behaviour with sexual health. Drawing on the sociology of Pierre Bourdieu and, in particular, his concepts of field, habitus and symbolic violence, it will be argued that despite the rhetoric of participation, engagement and inclusion in current youth policy it continues to perpetuate and naturalise the symbolic order between ‘adults’ and young people and continues to position youth sexuality as potentially dangerous.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)191-205
JournalJournal of Youth Studies
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

youth policy
sexuality
present
adulthood
symbolic violence
heterosexuality
rhetoric
sociology
childhood
inclusion
participation
health

Cite this

@article{9fb6323ede124aaf9f13734518be12ab,
title = "Absent but present: a critical analysis of the representation of sexuality in recent youth policy in the UK",
abstract = "Current youth policy in England and Wales utilises ‘transition’ as the major framework for understanding young people's movement from ‘youth’ to ‘adulthood’. Underpinning this are developmental assumptions about who young people are and who they ‘should’ become, especially with regard to sexuality. ‘Childhood’ and ‘youth’ are conceptualised as asexual or pre-sexual categories and those young people who are deemed to have sexual knowledge are problematised. Transitions to adulthood are inescapably heteronormative: the movement to adulthood is not simply about becoming an adult, but about becoming a man or a woman conforming to compulsory heterosexuality. Current youth policy says little about young people's sexuality and when it does it frequently conflates sexual behaviour with sexual health. Drawing on the sociology of Pierre Bourdieu and, in particular, his concepts of field, habitus and symbolic violence, it will be argued that despite the rhetoric of participation, engagement and inclusion in current youth policy it continues to perpetuate and naturalise the symbolic order between ‘adults’ and young people and continues to position youth sexuality as potentially dangerous.",
author = "Allison Moore and Phil Prescott",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1080/13676261.2012.704991",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "191--205",
journal = "Journal of Youth Studies",
issn = "1367-6261",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

Absent but present: a critical analysis of the representation of sexuality in recent youth policy in the UK. / Moore, Allison; Prescott, Phil.

In: Journal of Youth Studies, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2013, p. 191-205.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Absent but present: a critical analysis of the representation of sexuality in recent youth policy in the UK

AU - Moore, Allison

AU - Prescott, Phil

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Current youth policy in England and Wales utilises ‘transition’ as the major framework for understanding young people's movement from ‘youth’ to ‘adulthood’. Underpinning this are developmental assumptions about who young people are and who they ‘should’ become, especially with regard to sexuality. ‘Childhood’ and ‘youth’ are conceptualised as asexual or pre-sexual categories and those young people who are deemed to have sexual knowledge are problematised. Transitions to adulthood are inescapably heteronormative: the movement to adulthood is not simply about becoming an adult, but about becoming a man or a woman conforming to compulsory heterosexuality. Current youth policy says little about young people's sexuality and when it does it frequently conflates sexual behaviour with sexual health. Drawing on the sociology of Pierre Bourdieu and, in particular, his concepts of field, habitus and symbolic violence, it will be argued that despite the rhetoric of participation, engagement and inclusion in current youth policy it continues to perpetuate and naturalise the symbolic order between ‘adults’ and young people and continues to position youth sexuality as potentially dangerous.

AB - Current youth policy in England and Wales utilises ‘transition’ as the major framework for understanding young people's movement from ‘youth’ to ‘adulthood’. Underpinning this are developmental assumptions about who young people are and who they ‘should’ become, especially with regard to sexuality. ‘Childhood’ and ‘youth’ are conceptualised as asexual or pre-sexual categories and those young people who are deemed to have sexual knowledge are problematised. Transitions to adulthood are inescapably heteronormative: the movement to adulthood is not simply about becoming an adult, but about becoming a man or a woman conforming to compulsory heterosexuality. Current youth policy says little about young people's sexuality and when it does it frequently conflates sexual behaviour with sexual health. Drawing on the sociology of Pierre Bourdieu and, in particular, his concepts of field, habitus and symbolic violence, it will be argued that despite the rhetoric of participation, engagement and inclusion in current youth policy it continues to perpetuate and naturalise the symbolic order between ‘adults’ and young people and continues to position youth sexuality as potentially dangerous.

U2 - 10.1080/13676261.2012.704991

DO - 10.1080/13676261.2012.704991

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 191

EP - 205

JO - Journal of Youth Studies

JF - Journal of Youth Studies

SN - 1367-6261

IS - 2

ER -