A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing? Patients' and Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions of Oxygen Therapy: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.

Carol Kelly, Dave Lynes, Mary O'Brien, Ben Shaw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)
160 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Despite emerging evidence and guidelines, poor prescribing and administration of oxygen therapy persists. This study aimed to explore healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) and patients’ perceptions of oxygen. Design: Semi-structured interviews with 28 patients and 34 HCPs. Findings: Three master themes uncovered: oxygen as a panacea, the burden of oxygen, and antecedents to beliefs. Patients used oxygen for breathlessness and as an enabler; they were grateful to oxygen and accepted it as part of the disease. HCPs used oxygen because it helps patients; it works; and it makes HCPs feel better. But oxygen is not benign and a burden is evident with potential antecedents to beliefs revealed. Summary: The findings suggest that a set of fixed beliefs regarding oxygen exist, influenced by several impacting factors. The perception that oxygen is a universal remedy presides, but is, at times, contradictory. These findings will raise awareness of entrenched cultures, influence future educational and research strategies, and inform policy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)616-632
Number of pages17
JournalClinical Respiratory Journal
Volume12
Issue number2
Early online date12 Oct 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2018

Keywords

  • COPD
  • healthcare professionals
  • oxygen
  • perceptions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing? Patients' and Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions of Oxygen Therapy: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this