A Step Towards Dynamic Foot Classification: Functional Grouping Using Ankle Joint Frontal Plane Motion in Running

Oliver Chalmers*, RICHARD PAGE, BEN LANGLEY

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (journal)peer-review

Abstract

Background: The premise behind static foot classification suggests structure dictate’s function. However, the validity of this has been challenged, as weak association between static foot type and dynamic motion exists. This has led to calls for dynamic assessments and classification of feet based on functional motion, yet methods to do this have been seldom explored.
Research Question: Within a group of runners do homogenous sub-groups of ankle joint complex (AJC) frontal plane motion exist?
Methods: A k means clustering analysis was conducted on the frontal plane AJC motion patterns of a group of healthy adults running barefoot (n= 42) to identify functional movement groups. Once identified, statistical parametric mapping was employed to determine the differences between clusters across stance. The identified clusters were used to determine dynamic foot type; an agreement analysis was conducted between the newly defined foot types and the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6).
Results: Two distinct clusters were identified. Waveform analysis identified that cluster 1 displayed significantly (p < .001) less AJC eversion between 0 – 97% of the stance phase compared to cluster 2, with the differences between clusters associated with large effect sizes (g > 1). Based on the displayed kinematic profiles, cluster 1 was defined as a Neutral Dynamic Foot Type (NeutralDFT), and cluster 2 a Pronated Dynamic Foot Type (Pronated DynamicDFT). The newly defined foot type measure had only a slight agreement (κ = 0.08) with the FPI-6.
Significance: We demonstrated a protocol to classify a runner’s foot type derived directly from AJC motion during running. Poor agreement between the dynamic and static classification measures further evidence that these assessments are not analogous. Our results question the validity of static classification when looking to characterise the foot during running, suggesting dynamic assessments are more appropriate to reflect the foots functional response.
Original languageEnglish
JournalGait and Posture
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 7 Jul 2022

Keywords

  • functional grouping
  • foot classification
  • k means
  • foot kinematics
  • running

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Step Towards Dynamic Foot Classification: Functional Grouping Using Ankle Joint Frontal Plane Motion in Running'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this