A review of the use of a systematic observation method in coaching research between 1997-2016

Ed Cope, Mark Partington, Steven Harvey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
115 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A systematic observation method has been one of the most popularly employed methods in coaching research. Kahan’s review of this method conducted between 1975-1997 highlighted the key trends in this research, and offered methodological guidance for researchers wishing to use this method in their research. The purpose of this review was to provide an update of the use of a systematic observation method in coaching research and assess the extent to which the calls made by Kahan have been addressed. While in some respect this field of study has progressed (i.e. the introduction of qualitative methods), researchers adopting this method have failed to attend to many of the issues Kahan raised. For this method to continue to a make a positive contribution toward the coaching research literature, researchers need to more critically reflect on how and why they are employing this method. At present, some of the decisions made by researchers who have conducted work in this area are not justified with a rationale. It is our intention that this review will serve as guidance for researchers and practitioners, and editors and reviewers of journals when attempting to assess the quality of this type of work.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Sports Sciences
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Nov 2016

Fingerprint

Observation
Research
Research Personnel
Mentoring

Cite this

@article{459b85608c3f4977bc9adfa8d79061ed,
title = "A review of the use of a systematic observation method in coaching research between 1997-2016",
abstract = "A systematic observation method has been one of the most popularly employed methods in coaching research. Kahan’s review of this method conducted between 1975-1997 highlighted the key trends in this research, and offered methodological guidance for researchers wishing to use this method in their research. The purpose of this review was to provide an update of the use of a systematic observation method in coaching research and assess the extent to which the calls made by Kahan have been addressed. While in some respect this field of study has progressed (i.e. the introduction of qualitative methods), researchers adopting this method have failed to attend to many of the issues Kahan raised. For this method to continue to a make a positive contribution toward the coaching research literature, researchers need to more critically reflect on how and why they are employing this method. At present, some of the decisions made by researchers who have conducted work in this area are not justified with a rationale. It is our intention that this review will serve as guidance for researchers and practitioners, and editors and reviewers of journals when attempting to assess the quality of this type of work.",
author = "Ed Cope and Mark Partington and Steven Harvey",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1080/02640414.2016.1252463",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Sports Sciences",
issn = "0264-0414",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

}

A review of the use of a systematic observation method in coaching research between 1997-2016. / Cope, Ed; Partington, Mark; Harvey, Steven.

In: Journal of Sports Sciences, 15.11.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A review of the use of a systematic observation method in coaching research between 1997-2016

AU - Cope, Ed

AU - Partington, Mark

AU - Harvey, Steven

PY - 2016/11/15

Y1 - 2016/11/15

N2 - A systematic observation method has been one of the most popularly employed methods in coaching research. Kahan’s review of this method conducted between 1975-1997 highlighted the key trends in this research, and offered methodological guidance for researchers wishing to use this method in their research. The purpose of this review was to provide an update of the use of a systematic observation method in coaching research and assess the extent to which the calls made by Kahan have been addressed. While in some respect this field of study has progressed (i.e. the introduction of qualitative methods), researchers adopting this method have failed to attend to many of the issues Kahan raised. For this method to continue to a make a positive contribution toward the coaching research literature, researchers need to more critically reflect on how and why they are employing this method. At present, some of the decisions made by researchers who have conducted work in this area are not justified with a rationale. It is our intention that this review will serve as guidance for researchers and practitioners, and editors and reviewers of journals when attempting to assess the quality of this type of work.

AB - A systematic observation method has been one of the most popularly employed methods in coaching research. Kahan’s review of this method conducted between 1975-1997 highlighted the key trends in this research, and offered methodological guidance for researchers wishing to use this method in their research. The purpose of this review was to provide an update of the use of a systematic observation method in coaching research and assess the extent to which the calls made by Kahan have been addressed. While in some respect this field of study has progressed (i.e. the introduction of qualitative methods), researchers adopting this method have failed to attend to many of the issues Kahan raised. For this method to continue to a make a positive contribution toward the coaching research literature, researchers need to more critically reflect on how and why they are employing this method. At present, some of the decisions made by researchers who have conducted work in this area are not justified with a rationale. It is our intention that this review will serve as guidance for researchers and practitioners, and editors and reviewers of journals when attempting to assess the quality of this type of work.

U2 - 10.1080/02640414.2016.1252463

DO - 10.1080/02640414.2016.1252463

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Sports Sciences

JF - Journal of Sports Sciences

SN - 0264-0414

ER -