Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A review of stress management interventions for the oncology nursing workforce: What do we know and what should we be doing differently?

  • University of Chester
  • Centre for Contextual Behavioural Science

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Oncology nurses are at risk of chronic stress. In this narrative review we provide an overview of stress management intervention studies for oncology nurses, and suggest that Acceptance and Commitment Therapy/Training (ACT) provides a better intervention framework due to the relevance of underpinning therapeutic processes (e.g. acceptance, mindfulness, values clarification) to the role and stress-related experiences of this workforce population. Current evidence for the effectiveness of stress management intervention varies, with few studies describing how theory informs intervention content, or justifying why they should benefit this population specifically. ACT lends itself to data-driven intervention development, thus potentially addressing some methodological limitations in this field. Only one trial has tested ACT in this population, reporting only partial effects. Further empirical research is required given (a) the applicability of ACT for this population and context, and (b) the associated advantages of brief and/or group delivery to address known barriers to participating in stress management interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)289-307
Number of pages19
JournalHealth Psychology Report
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • ACT
  • Intervention
  • Oncology nurses
  • Stress management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A review of stress management interventions for the oncology nursing workforce: What do we know and what should we be doing differently?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this