'A psychological regularity to which no physiological regularity corresponds?': Some remarks on understanding and learning

Leon Culbertson*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

With Ludwig Wittgenstein readers may be concerned about the underlying conception of psychological attributes as states or processes in the brain, and there is a particular view of representation that they might find troubling too. It's important to remember that there are many different general ways that readers use the words ‘understand’ and ‘understanding’. Wittgenstein noted that ‘one could say: to understand a word means to know how to use it.’ Wittgenstein is reported as stressing that ‘to understand a phrase, readers might say, is to understand its use’, and ‘one could say: to understand a word means to know how to use’. He also emphasises in OC §10 that ‘it is only in use that the proposition has its sense’

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationWittgenstein and Education
Subtitle of host publicationOn Not Sparing Others the Trouble of Thinking
EditorsAdrian Skillbeck, Paul Standish
PublisherWiley
Pages44-55
Number of pages12
ISBN (Electronic)9781119912262
ISBN (Print)9781119912255
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Jul 2023

Keywords

  • Ludwig Wittgenstein
  • Psychological attributes
  • Understanding
  • Learning
  • Occasion-sensitivity
  • Neuroscience
  • Educational neuroscience
  • Meaning and use

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of ''A psychological regularity to which no physiological regularity corresponds?': Some remarks on understanding and learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this