A Philosophical Defence of the University Lecture

AMANDA FULFORD, Aine Mahon

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    As a host of published books, journal articles and opinion pieces attest, the university lecture is now distinctly out of step with contemporary Higher Education discourse. Academics across university disciplines confidently proclaim the format’s obsolescence, arguing that only inertia and familiarity could satisfactorily account for the lecture’s survival. We propose in this paper to offer a philosophical revisiting of this most maligned of pedagogical forms. Drawing on the philosophy of Stanley Cavell, we argue for the lecture not as a mode of dissemination but as a mode of address. On this model, the lecture is to be understood as a special form of human encounter where the voice of one is modulated specifically for the hearing of another. Thus, we propose in this paper to offer a philosophical defence of traditional university teaching. We argue that this defence has particular relevance for teaching and learning in the Humanities.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalOxford Review of Education
    Early online date19 Jan 2020
    DOIs
    Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 19 Jan 2020

    Fingerprint

    university teaching
    university
    discourse
    Teaching
    learning
    education
    philosophy

    Keywords

    • philosophy of education
    • higher education
    • pedagogy
    • lecture
    • Stanley Cavell

    Cite this

    @article{c5f9eb42cd504641b41b253ed1f3f61e,
    title = "A Philosophical Defence of the University Lecture",
    abstract = "As a host of published books, journal articles and opinion pieces attest, the university lecture is now distinctly out of step with contemporary Higher Education discourse. Academics across university disciplines confidently proclaim the format’s obsolescence, arguing that only inertia and familiarity could satisfactorily account for the lecture’s survival. We propose in this paper to offer a philosophical revisiting of this most maligned of pedagogical forms. Drawing on the philosophy of Stanley Cavell, we argue for the lecture not as a mode of dissemination but as a mode of address. On this model, the lecture is to be understood as a special form of human encounter where the voice of one is modulated specifically for the hearing of another. Thus, we propose in this paper to offer a philosophical defence of traditional university teaching. We argue that this defence has particular relevance for teaching and learning in the Humanities.",
    keywords = "philosophy of education, higher education, pedagogy, lecture, Stanley Cavell",
    author = "AMANDA FULFORD and Aine Mahon",
    year = "2020",
    month = "1",
    day = "19",
    doi = "10.1080/03054985.2019.1702013",
    language = "English",
    journal = "Oxford Review of Education",
    issn = "0305-4985",
    publisher = "Routledge",

    }

    A Philosophical Defence of the University Lecture. / FULFORD, AMANDA; Mahon, Aine .

    In: Oxford Review of Education, 19.01.2020.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A Philosophical Defence of the University Lecture

    AU - FULFORD, AMANDA

    AU - Mahon, Aine

    PY - 2020/1/19

    Y1 - 2020/1/19

    N2 - As a host of published books, journal articles and opinion pieces attest, the university lecture is now distinctly out of step with contemporary Higher Education discourse. Academics across university disciplines confidently proclaim the format’s obsolescence, arguing that only inertia and familiarity could satisfactorily account for the lecture’s survival. We propose in this paper to offer a philosophical revisiting of this most maligned of pedagogical forms. Drawing on the philosophy of Stanley Cavell, we argue for the lecture not as a mode of dissemination but as a mode of address. On this model, the lecture is to be understood as a special form of human encounter where the voice of one is modulated specifically for the hearing of another. Thus, we propose in this paper to offer a philosophical defence of traditional university teaching. We argue that this defence has particular relevance for teaching and learning in the Humanities.

    AB - As a host of published books, journal articles and opinion pieces attest, the university lecture is now distinctly out of step with contemporary Higher Education discourse. Academics across university disciplines confidently proclaim the format’s obsolescence, arguing that only inertia and familiarity could satisfactorily account for the lecture’s survival. We propose in this paper to offer a philosophical revisiting of this most maligned of pedagogical forms. Drawing on the philosophy of Stanley Cavell, we argue for the lecture not as a mode of dissemination but as a mode of address. On this model, the lecture is to be understood as a special form of human encounter where the voice of one is modulated specifically for the hearing of another. Thus, we propose in this paper to offer a philosophical defence of traditional university teaching. We argue that this defence has particular relevance for teaching and learning in the Humanities.

    KW - philosophy of education

    KW - higher education

    KW - pedagogy

    KW - lecture

    KW - Stanley Cavell

    U2 - 10.1080/03054985.2019.1702013

    DO - 10.1080/03054985.2019.1702013

    M3 - Article

    JO - Oxford Review of Education

    JF - Oxford Review of Education

    SN - 0305-4985

    ER -