TY - JOUR
T1 - A double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, feasibility phase III clinical trial of peri-operative immune-enhancing enteral nutrition in patients undergoing surgery for advanced head and neck cancer
AU - Ghosh, S
AU - Dempsey, G
AU - Skelly, R
AU - Shaw, R J
AU - Rogers, Simon N
AU - Lowe, D
AU - Jones, T M
PY - 2012/6
Y1 - 2012/6
N2 - Background & Aims: Conflicting evidence exists as to whether post-operative infections in patients with Squamous Cell carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN) are reduced by peri-operative enteral feeding with immune-enhancing feeds such as Impact, which contains l-arginine, nucleotides and omega-3 fatty acids. Our study aimed to address this conflict.
Methods: We conducted a single centre, double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, clinical trial. Patients undergoing surgery for SCCHN were fed enterally with either Impact or an iso-nitrogenous, iso-caloric control feed for five days pre and seven days post-surgery. The rates of systemic and local infective complications, length of hospital stay and peri-operative mortality rates were compared between the two groups.
Results: Data for analysis were available for 57 patients; 28 who received IMPACT and 29 the control feed. A primary infection occurred in 35% (20/57) of patients; 43% (12/28) in the Impact group and 28% (8/29) in the control group, (P = 0.27, Fishers Exact test). No differences in secondary infection rates or length of hospital stay were observed between the groups.
Conclusions: In this under-powered study, peri-operative use of Impact in patients undergoing surgery for SCCHN did not lead to significant differences in infective complications, length of hospital stay or peri-operative mortality. Larger studies are required.
AB - Background & Aims: Conflicting evidence exists as to whether post-operative infections in patients with Squamous Cell carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN) are reduced by peri-operative enteral feeding with immune-enhancing feeds such as Impact, which contains l-arginine, nucleotides and omega-3 fatty acids. Our study aimed to address this conflict.
Methods: We conducted a single centre, double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, clinical trial. Patients undergoing surgery for SCCHN were fed enterally with either Impact or an iso-nitrogenous, iso-caloric control feed for five days pre and seven days post-surgery. The rates of systemic and local infective complications, length of hospital stay and peri-operative mortality rates were compared between the two groups.
Results: Data for analysis were available for 57 patients; 28 who received IMPACT and 29 the control feed. A primary infection occurred in 35% (20/57) of patients; 43% (12/28) in the Impact group and 28% (8/29) in the control group, (P = 0.27, Fishers Exact test). No differences in secondary infection rates or length of hospital stay were observed between the groups.
Conclusions: In this under-powered study, peri-operative use of Impact in patients undergoing surgery for SCCHN did not lead to significant differences in infective complications, length of hospital stay or peri-operative mortality. Larger studies are required.
U2 - 10.1016/j.clnme.2011.12.001
DO - 10.1016/j.clnme.2011.12.001
M3 - Article (journal)
SN - 2212-8263
VL - 7
SP - 107
EP - 114
JO - e-SPEN Journal: The European e-Journal of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism
JF - e-SPEN Journal: The European e-Journal of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism
IS - 3
ER -