A discourse of disconnection – challenges to clinical engagement and collaborative dental commissioning

Rebecca Harris, Jayne Garner, Elizabeth Perkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim While doctors are moving centre-stage into managerial and leadership commissioning roles, the role of clinicians in NHS dental commissioning has retained a mainly representative model. In this paper we describe the discourse of ‘rank and file’ dental practitioners and the implications of this for clinical engagement and clinical leadership in dentistry. Method As part of an NIHR study of NHS dental contracting a questionnaire was sent to 925 practitioners. The questionnaire included a free text box inviting further comment. We received 113 lengthy narratives in 333 (43%) of the questionnaires returned and so undertook a discourse analysis of this data - focusing on the use of language, shared meaning and how practitioners portrayed their identity and activities. Results Three discursive repertoires were identified: professional subordination; a disconnected hierarchy; and a strained collegiality. Underpinning these repertoires was the sense of disjuncture between the macro-level (managerial) and micro-level (practice), and the problematic nature of clinical leadership in a profession where dentists’ common identity is fractured by their individual clinical and business practice. Conclusions This paper presents an insight into the views of dental practitioners in their own words, and the challenges of engaging dental practitioners in a new commissioning era.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)393-397
JournalBritish Dental Journal
Volume218
Issue number7
Early online date10 Apr 2015
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 10 Apr 2015

Fingerprint

Tooth
Dentistry
Dentists
Language
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

@article{13d1ceccd296496c8dea91bbd8c7beff,
title = "A discourse of disconnection – challenges to clinical engagement and collaborative dental commissioning",
abstract = "Aim While doctors are moving centre-stage into managerial and leadership commissioning roles, the role of clinicians in NHS dental commissioning has retained a mainly representative model. In this paper we describe the discourse of ‘rank and file’ dental practitioners and the implications of this for clinical engagement and clinical leadership in dentistry. Method As part of an NIHR study of NHS dental contracting a questionnaire was sent to 925 practitioners. The questionnaire included a free text box inviting further comment. We received 113 lengthy narratives in 333 (43{\%}) of the questionnaires returned and so undertook a discourse analysis of this data - focusing on the use of language, shared meaning and how practitioners portrayed their identity and activities. Results Three discursive repertoires were identified: professional subordination; a disconnected hierarchy; and a strained collegiality. Underpinning these repertoires was the sense of disjuncture between the macro-level (managerial) and micro-level (practice), and the problematic nature of clinical leadership in a profession where dentists’ common identity is fractured by their individual clinical and business practice. Conclusions This paper presents an insight into the views of dental practitioners in their own words, and the challenges of engaging dental practitioners in a new commissioning era.",
author = "Rebecca Harris and Jayne Garner and Elizabeth Perkins",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.246",
language = "English",
volume = "218",
pages = "393--397",
journal = "British Dental Journal",
issn = "0007-0610",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "7",

}

A discourse of disconnection – challenges to clinical engagement and collaborative dental commissioning. / Harris, Rebecca; Garner, Jayne; Perkins, Elizabeth.

In: British Dental Journal, Vol. 218, No. 7, 10.04.2015, p. 393-397.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A discourse of disconnection – challenges to clinical engagement and collaborative dental commissioning

AU - Harris, Rebecca

AU - Garner, Jayne

AU - Perkins, Elizabeth

PY - 2015/4/10

Y1 - 2015/4/10

N2 - Aim While doctors are moving centre-stage into managerial and leadership commissioning roles, the role of clinicians in NHS dental commissioning has retained a mainly representative model. In this paper we describe the discourse of ‘rank and file’ dental practitioners and the implications of this for clinical engagement and clinical leadership in dentistry. Method As part of an NIHR study of NHS dental contracting a questionnaire was sent to 925 practitioners. The questionnaire included a free text box inviting further comment. We received 113 lengthy narratives in 333 (43%) of the questionnaires returned and so undertook a discourse analysis of this data - focusing on the use of language, shared meaning and how practitioners portrayed their identity and activities. Results Three discursive repertoires were identified: professional subordination; a disconnected hierarchy; and a strained collegiality. Underpinning these repertoires was the sense of disjuncture between the macro-level (managerial) and micro-level (practice), and the problematic nature of clinical leadership in a profession where dentists’ common identity is fractured by their individual clinical and business practice. Conclusions This paper presents an insight into the views of dental practitioners in their own words, and the challenges of engaging dental practitioners in a new commissioning era.

AB - Aim While doctors are moving centre-stage into managerial and leadership commissioning roles, the role of clinicians in NHS dental commissioning has retained a mainly representative model. In this paper we describe the discourse of ‘rank and file’ dental practitioners and the implications of this for clinical engagement and clinical leadership in dentistry. Method As part of an NIHR study of NHS dental contracting a questionnaire was sent to 925 practitioners. The questionnaire included a free text box inviting further comment. We received 113 lengthy narratives in 333 (43%) of the questionnaires returned and so undertook a discourse analysis of this data - focusing on the use of language, shared meaning and how practitioners portrayed their identity and activities. Results Three discursive repertoires were identified: professional subordination; a disconnected hierarchy; and a strained collegiality. Underpinning these repertoires was the sense of disjuncture between the macro-level (managerial) and micro-level (practice), and the problematic nature of clinical leadership in a profession where dentists’ common identity is fractured by their individual clinical and business practice. Conclusions This paper presents an insight into the views of dental practitioners in their own words, and the challenges of engaging dental practitioners in a new commissioning era.

U2 - 10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.246

DO - 10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.246

M3 - Article

VL - 218

SP - 393

EP - 397

JO - British Dental Journal

JF - British Dental Journal

SN - 0007-0610

IS - 7

ER -