A critical investigation of the relationship between masculinity, social justice, religious education and the neo-liberal discourse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to critically investigate a group of year 11 boys’ relationship to RE in response to debates about boys’ underachievement in RE. Design/methodology/approach – Qualitative data were collected through observations and semi-structured interviews. Data analysis draws upon pro-feminist and poststructuralist theories of the gendered subject. Findings – The data presented in this paper reveals how RE functioned as a political space for the exploration of social justice issues that formed part of the boys’ daily experiences, serving to increase awareness and understanding of diversity. Research limitations/implications – At a time of curriculum change where RE has been marginalised by exclusion from the DfE's English Baccalaureate this paper also seeks to contribute to debates about education for social justice through critical, pluralistic RE within a neo-liberal policy context. Practical implications – RE is shown to be a potent educational resource for challenging pupils’ negative social practices and producing more reflexive masculine subjects. Social implications – The contribution of RE to ensuring greater understanding and dialogue requires reassertion and protection within the curriculum. Originality/value – The data presented shows that where RE is taken up by masculine subjects it offers an alternative discourse with potential to create community cohesion and interfaith dialogue. Keywords: Masculinity, Social justice, Neo-liberalism, Religious education
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)650-662
Number of pages13
JournalEducation + Training
Volume56
Issue number7
Early online date9 Sep 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Sep 2014

Fingerprint

religious education
masculinity
social justice
discourse
dialogue
curriculum
neoliberalism
pupil
data analysis
exclusion
methodology
interview
resources
community
Values
education
experience
Group

Keywords

  • Masculinity
  • Neo-liberalism
  • Religious education
  • Social justice

Cite this

@article{e117854087ec43928f0bd5837f27c03e,
title = "A critical investigation of the relationship between masculinity, social justice, religious education and the neo-liberal discourse",
abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to critically investigate a group of year 11 boys’ relationship to RE in response to debates about boys’ underachievement in RE. Design/methodology/approach – Qualitative data were collected through observations and semi-structured interviews. Data analysis draws upon pro-feminist and poststructuralist theories of the gendered subject. Findings – The data presented in this paper reveals how RE functioned as a political space for the exploration of social justice issues that formed part of the boys’ daily experiences, serving to increase awareness and understanding of diversity. Research limitations/implications – At a time of curriculum change where RE has been marginalised by exclusion from the DfE's English Baccalaureate this paper also seeks to contribute to debates about education for social justice through critical, pluralistic RE within a neo-liberal policy context. Practical implications – RE is shown to be a potent educational resource for challenging pupils’ negative social practices and producing more reflexive masculine subjects. Social implications – The contribution of RE to ensuring greater understanding and dialogue requires reassertion and protection within the curriculum. Originality/value – The data presented shows that where RE is taken up by masculine subjects it offers an alternative discourse with potential to create community cohesion and interfaith dialogue. Keywords: Masculinity, Social justice, Neo-liberalism, Religious education",
keywords = "Masculinity, Neo-liberalism, Religious education, Social justice",
author = "Francis Farrell",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1108/ET-07-2014-0082",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "650--662",
journal = "Education and Training",
issn = "0040-0912",
publisher = "Emerald",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A critical investigation of the relationship between masculinity, social justice, religious education and the neo-liberal discourse

AU - Farrell, Francis

PY - 2014/9/15

Y1 - 2014/9/15

N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to critically investigate a group of year 11 boys’ relationship to RE in response to debates about boys’ underachievement in RE. Design/methodology/approach – Qualitative data were collected through observations and semi-structured interviews. Data analysis draws upon pro-feminist and poststructuralist theories of the gendered subject. Findings – The data presented in this paper reveals how RE functioned as a political space for the exploration of social justice issues that formed part of the boys’ daily experiences, serving to increase awareness and understanding of diversity. Research limitations/implications – At a time of curriculum change where RE has been marginalised by exclusion from the DfE's English Baccalaureate this paper also seeks to contribute to debates about education for social justice through critical, pluralistic RE within a neo-liberal policy context. Practical implications – RE is shown to be a potent educational resource for challenging pupils’ negative social practices and producing more reflexive masculine subjects. Social implications – The contribution of RE to ensuring greater understanding and dialogue requires reassertion and protection within the curriculum. Originality/value – The data presented shows that where RE is taken up by masculine subjects it offers an alternative discourse with potential to create community cohesion and interfaith dialogue. Keywords: Masculinity, Social justice, Neo-liberalism, Religious education

AB - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to critically investigate a group of year 11 boys’ relationship to RE in response to debates about boys’ underachievement in RE. Design/methodology/approach – Qualitative data were collected through observations and semi-structured interviews. Data analysis draws upon pro-feminist and poststructuralist theories of the gendered subject. Findings – The data presented in this paper reveals how RE functioned as a political space for the exploration of social justice issues that formed part of the boys’ daily experiences, serving to increase awareness and understanding of diversity. Research limitations/implications – At a time of curriculum change where RE has been marginalised by exclusion from the DfE's English Baccalaureate this paper also seeks to contribute to debates about education for social justice through critical, pluralistic RE within a neo-liberal policy context. Practical implications – RE is shown to be a potent educational resource for challenging pupils’ negative social practices and producing more reflexive masculine subjects. Social implications – The contribution of RE to ensuring greater understanding and dialogue requires reassertion and protection within the curriculum. Originality/value – The data presented shows that where RE is taken up by masculine subjects it offers an alternative discourse with potential to create community cohesion and interfaith dialogue. Keywords: Masculinity, Social justice, Neo-liberalism, Religious education

KW - Masculinity

KW - Neo-liberalism

KW - Religious education

KW - Social justice

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/critical-investigation-relationship-between-masculinity-social-justice-religious-education-neolibera

U2 - 10.1108/ET-07-2014-0082

DO - 10.1108/ET-07-2014-0082

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 650

EP - 662

JO - Education and Training

JF - Education and Training

SN - 0040-0912

IS - 7

ER -